These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19261293)

  • 41. Accuracy of popular automatic QT interval algorithms assessed by a 'gold standard' and comparison with a Novel method: computer simulation study.
    Hunt AC
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2005 Sep; 5():29. PubMed ID: 16185361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Z-score for benchmarking reader competence in a central ECG laboratory.
    Panicker GK; Karnad DR; Joshi R; Shetty S; Vyas N; Kothari S; Narula D
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2009 Jan; 14(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 19149789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A principal component regression approach for estimation of ventricular repolarization characteristics.
    Lipponen JA; Tarvainen MP; Laitinen T; Lyyra-Laitinen T; Karjalainen PA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 57(5):1062-9. PubMed ID: 20142157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Predicting arrhythmia-free survival using spectral and modified-moving average analyses of T-wave alternans.
    Cox V; Patel M; Kim J; Liu T; Sivaraman G; Narayan SM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 17367354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. New descriptors of T-wave morphology are independent of heart rate.
    Andersen MP; Xue JQ; Graff C; Kanters JK; Toft E; Struijk JJ
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 18804787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Electrocardiographic reference ranges derived from 79,743 ambulatory subjects.
    Mason JW; Ramseth DJ; Chanter DO; Moon TE; Goodman DB; Mendzelevski B
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 17276451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Subject-specific heart rate dependency of electrocardiographic QT, PQ, and QRS intervals.
    Malik M; Hnatkova K; Sisakova M; Schmidt G
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):491-7. PubMed ID: 18817925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessment of electrocardiographic parameters in patients with electrocution injury.
    Karataş MB; Onuk T; Güngör B; İpek G; Özcan KS; Kaplangöray M; Çanga Y; Durmuş G; Çakıllı Y; Bolca O
    J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(5):809-14. PubMed ID: 26209300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. QT dispersion is not associated with sudden cardiac death or mortality in heart transplant recipients.
    Marcus GM; Hoang KL; Hunt SA; Chun SH; Lee BK
    Heart Surg Forum; 2008; 11(5):E281-4. PubMed ID: 18948241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Psychotropic drugs associated with corrected QT interval prolongation.
    van Noord C; Straus SM; Sturkenboom MC; Hofman A; Aarnoudse AJ; Bagnardi V; Kors JA; Newton-Cheh C; Witteman JC; Stricker BH
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Feb; 29(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 19142100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Re: Predicting arrhythmia-free survival using spectral and modified-moving average analyses of T-wave alternans.
    Madias JE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Dec; 30(12):1585; author reply 1586-7. PubMed ID: 18070321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Features of an exceptionally narrow QRS data set.
    Childers R; Holmes A; Kocherginsky M; Childers D; Pariser J
    J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 18822422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. QRS complexes detection for ECG signal: the Difference Operation Method.
    Yeh YC; Wang WJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Sep; 91(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 18547674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of semiautomated and fully automated methods for QT measurement during a thorough QT/QTc study: variability and sample size considerations.
    Tyl B; Kabbaj M; Fassi B; De Jode P; Wheeler W
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 49(8):905-15. PubMed ID: 19542314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A new look at an old question-how good is the computer in the diagnosis of arrhythmias?
    Laks MM; Lobodzinski S
    J Electrocardiol; 2005 Oct; 38(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 16216610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. On an improved T-wave alternans index: a hypothesis.
    Madias JE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jun; 32(6):786-7. PubMed ID: 19545342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Power-line interference detection and suppression in ECG signal processing.
    Lin YD; Hu YH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):354-7. PubMed ID: 18232382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of manual and automated measurements of the QT interval in healthy volunteers: an analysis of five thorough QT studies.
    Fosser C; Duczynski G; Agin M; Wicker P; Darpo B
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Nov; 86(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 19339965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. ECGScan: a method for conversion of paper electrocardiographic printouts to digital electrocardiographic files.
    Badilini F; Erdem T; Zareba W; Moss AJ
    J Electrocardiol; 2005 Oct; 38(4):310-8. PubMed ID: 16216602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of two methods of estimating reader variability in QT interval measurements in thorough QT/QTc studies.
    Salvi V; Karnad DR; Kerkar V; Panicker GK; Natekar M; Kothari S
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2014 Mar; 19(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 24521536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.