BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19261434)

  • 1. Double-concave deformity of the polyethylene tibial post in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
    Niki Y; Matsumoto H; Yoshimine F; Toyama Y; Suda Y; Banks SA
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):497.e7-10. PubMed ID: 19261434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recurrent dissociation of the tibial insert after mini-subvastus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a case report.
    In Y; Sur YJ; Won HY; Moon YS
    Knee; 2011 Dec; 18(6):461-3. PubMed ID: 20833051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
    McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Bourne RB; Marr JT
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):33-8. PubMed ID: 19447001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re: A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
    Olgun ZD; Atilla B
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):499; author reply 499. PubMed ID: 20171046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failure of a metal-reinforced tibial post in total knee arthroplasty.
    Bal BS; Greenberg D
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):464-7. PubMed ID: 17400105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Backside damage corresponding to articular damage in retrieved tibial polyethylene inserts.
    Harman MK; Banks SA; Hodge WA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():137-44. PubMed ID: 17242615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociation of polyethylene insert from the tibial baseplate following revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Chen CE; Juhn RJ; Ko JY
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Feb; 26(2):339.e11-3. PubMed ID: 20570104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep flexion-oriented bisurface-type knee joint and its tibial rotation that attributes its high performance of flexion.
    Ueo T; Kihara Y; Ikeda N; Kawai J; Nakamura K; Hirokawa S
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):476-82. PubMed ID: 20413246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early nontraumatic fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in a NexGen LPS-Flex posterior stabilized knee prosthesis.
    Lee CS; Chen WM; Kou HC; Lo WH; Chen CL
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Dec; 24(8):1292.e5-9. PubMed ID: 19303252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post damage in contemporary posterior-stabilized tibial inserts: influence of implant design and clinical relevance.
    ; Medel FJ; Kurtz SM; Sharkey PF; Austin MS; Klein GR; Cohen AR; Patel H; Goldberg VM; Kraay MJ; Rimnac CM
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):606-14. PubMed ID: 21575793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in posterior stabilized (Insall Burstein II) total knee arthroplasty.
    Mestha P; Shenava Y; D'Arcy JC
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Sep; 15(6):814-5. PubMed ID: 11021462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nontraumatic, spontaneous dislocation of polyethylene tibial insert 1 year after TKA.
    Wright RC; Crouch A; Yacoubian SV; Raven RB; Falkinstein Y; Yacoubian SV
    Orthopedics; 2011 Dec; 34(12):e933-5. PubMed ID: 22146212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spontaneous late dislocation of the high flexion tibial insert after Genesis II total knee arthroplasty. A case report.
    Rutten SG; Janssen RP
    Knee; 2009 Oct; 16(5):409-11. PubMed ID: 19264493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Uncemented knee prosthesis. Results apropos of 58 cases with a minimum of 5-year follow-up].
    Gacon G; Coillard JY; Barba L; Travers V
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1995; 81(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 8560021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro.
    Nicholls RL; Schirm AC; Jeffcote BO; Kuster MS
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1506-12. PubMed ID: 17568418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Angled polyethylene insert exchange for sagittal tibial malalignment in total knee arthroplasty.
    Sah AP; Scott RD; Iorio R
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jan; 23(1):141-4. PubMed ID: 18165044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of polyethylene tibial insert damage from in vivo function and in vitro wear simulation.
    Harman MK; DesJardins J; Benson L; Banks SA; LaBerge M; Hodge WA
    J Orthop Res; 2009 Apr; 27(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 18932244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of wear in retrieved mobile and fixed bearing knee inserts.
    Engh GA; Zimmerman RL; Parks NL; Engh CA
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):28-32. PubMed ID: 19427754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tibiofemoral contact behavior is improved in high-flexion cruciate retaining TKA.
    Most E; Sultan PG; Park SE; Papannagari R; Li G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Nov; 452():59-64. PubMed ID: 16980895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface damage on open box posterior-stabilized polyethylene tibial inserts.
    Silva M; Kabbash CA; Tiberi JV; Park SH; Reilly DT; Mahoney OM; Schmalzried TP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):135-44. PubMed ID: 14646752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.