275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19261580)
21. Word frequency, predictability, and return-sweep saccades: Towards the modeling of eye movements during paragraph reading.
Parker AJ; Slattery TJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1614-1633. PubMed ID: 31524433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lack of contextual-word predictability during reading in patients with mild Alzheimer disease.
Fernández G; Manes F; Rotstein NP; Colombo O; Mandolesi P; Politi LE; Agamennoni O
Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():143-51. PubMed ID: 25080188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous text.
Vitu F; O'Regan JK; Mittau M
Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jun; 47(6):583-600. PubMed ID: 2367179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading.
Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 17826758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading.
Paterson KB; Jordan TR
Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 20516230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG.
Kretzschmar F; Schlesewsky M; Staub A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1648-62. PubMed ID: 26010829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of word predictability and preview lexicality on eye movements during reading: A comparison between young and older adults.
Choi W; Lowder MW; Ferreira F; Swaab TY; Henderson JM
Psychol Aging; 2017 May; 32(3):232-242. PubMed ID: 28333501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.
Schmauder AR; Morris RK; Poynor DV
Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1098-108. PubMed ID: 11126934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.
Kliegl R; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):12-35. PubMed ID: 16478314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.
Reingold EM; Reichle ED; Glaholt MG; Sheridan H
Cogn Psychol; 2012 Sep; 65(2):177-206. PubMed ID: 22542804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading.
Kliegl R; Hohenstein S; Yan M; McDonald SA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):581-600. PubMed ID: 22515948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading.
Staub A; Grant M; Clifton C; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):806-14. PubMed ID: 19379050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Solving the chicken-and-egg problem of letter detection and fixation duration in reading.
Roy-Charland A; Saint-Aubin J; Lawrence MA; Klein RM
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1553-62. PubMed ID: 19801615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: evidence from eye movements when reading Thai.
Winskel H; Perea M; Ratitamkul T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1522-36. PubMed ID: 22502779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words.
Rayner K
Perception; 1979; 8(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 432075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Syntactic priming in comprehension: the role of argument order and animacy.
Carminati MN; van Gompel RP; Scheepers C; Arai M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1098-110. PubMed ID: 18763894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. How fast can predictability influence word skipping during reading?
Fitzsimmons G; Drieghe D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1054-63. PubMed ID: 23244054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.
Reichle ED; Warren T; McConnell K
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19145006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
