These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19261585)

  • 1. Binding of event files in a (go/no-go) simon task with an accessory peripheral signal.
    Maetens K; Henderickx D; Soetens E
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 19261585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Congruency reversals in an accessory signal Simon task with auditory and visual stimuli.
    Soetens E; Maetens K; Zeischka P; Henderickx D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 20451168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simon effects in change detection and change blindness.
    Schankin A; Hagemann D; Wascher E
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):1022-33. PubMed ID: 25408533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decay of stimulus spatial code in horizontal and vertical Simon tasks.
    Vallesi A; Umiltà CA
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Oct; 136(4):350-73. PubMed ID: 19943610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: evidence from a Simon task.
    Fischer R; Plessow F; Kiesel A
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 20178922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):816-34. PubMed ID: 19485694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions.
    Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Dec; 28(6):726-37. PubMed ID: 19674802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Redundancy gain in the Simon Task: Does increasing relevant activation reduce the effect of irrelevant activation?
    Mittelstädt V; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1153-1167. PubMed ID: 29683718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irrelevant auditory attention shifts prime corresponding responses.
    Notebaert W; Soetens E
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 12684781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: an omnibus analysis and its implications.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Lupiáñez J
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Feb; 64(2):318-27. PubMed ID: 12013383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elimination of the enhanced Simon effect for older adults in a three-choice situation: ageing and the Simon effect in a go/no-go Simon task.
    Kubo-Kawai N; Kawai N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):452-64. PubMed ID: 19575334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
    Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
    van Dam WO; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response to an intervening event reverses nonspatial repetition effects in 2AFC tasks: nonspatial IOR?
    Spadaro A; He C; Milliken B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):331-49. PubMed ID: 22160785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of laterality and pitch height of an auditory accessory stimulus on horizontal response selection: the Simon effect and the SMARC effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Aug; 16(4):666-70. PubMed ID: 19648450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.