These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19261588)

  • 1. The representation of instructions operates like a prepared reflex: flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S-R instructions.
    Cohen-Kdoshay O; Meiran N
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 19261588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory load but not multitasking eliminates the prepared reflex: further evidence from the adapted flanker paradigm.
    Meiran N; Cohen-Kdoshay O
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Feb; 139(2):309-13. PubMed ID: 22305352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm.
    Cohen-Kdoshay O; Meiran N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Aug; 60(8):1140-54. PubMed ID: 17654396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning through instructions vs. learning through practice: flanker congruency effects from instructed and applied S-R mappings.
    Wenke D; De Houwer J; De Winne J; Liefooghe B
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):899-912. PubMed ID: 26511962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practiceand flanker-response contingencies.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 19289363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks.
    Wendt M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 17546462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A role for set in the control of automatic spatial response activation.
    Risko EF; Besner D
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18271352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of practice and stimulus-onset-asynchrony in modulating effects of stimulus repetition, category relation, and response compatibility in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Zhang H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):1087-96. PubMed ID: 9172226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects.
    Wühr P; Biebl R; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 18444754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Coding specificity of orthogonal S-R compatibility].
    Kleinsorge T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(4):249-64. PubMed ID: 10551040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Slippage theory and the flanker paradigm: an early-selection account of selective attention failures.
    Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Jung K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1257-73. PubMed ID: 24730746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-based working memory guidance of visual attention.
    Chen Z; Tsou BH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1082-95. PubMed ID: 21264740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect.
    Gevers W; Verguts T; Reynvoet B; Caessens B; Fias W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 16478324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-related decay or interference-based forgetting in working memory?
    Portrat S; Barrouillet P; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1561-4. PubMed ID: 18980415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How much attention does an event file need?
    Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1067-82. PubMed ID: 16262499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Larger IOR effects following forget than following remember instructions depend on exogenous attentional withdrawal and target localization.
    Taylor TL; Fawcett JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1790-814. PubMed ID: 21618066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of working memory training on memory performance in old-old adults.
    Buschkuehl M; Jaeggi SM; Hutchison S; Perrig-Chiello P; Däpp C; Müller M; Breil F; Hoppeler H; Perrig WJ
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Dec; 23(4):743-53. PubMed ID: 19140646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Updating of working memory: lingering bindings.
    Oberauer K; Vockenberg K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):967-87. PubMed ID: 19034717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.