These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19261762)

  • 1. Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system.
    Gauci SA; Dantas AM; Williams DA; Kemm RE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 19261762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The efficacy of interactive lecturing for students with diverse science backgrounds.
    Ernst H; Colthorpe K
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Mar; 31(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 17327581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A blended approach to active learning in a physiology laboratory-based subject facilitated by an e-learning component.
    Dantas AM; Kemm RE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2008 Mar; 32(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 18334571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
    Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of using an audience response system on learning environment, motivation and long-term retention, during case-discussions in a large group of undergraduate veterinary clinical pharmacology students.
    Doucet M; Vrins A; Harvey D
    Med Teach; 2009 Dec; 31(12):e570-9. PubMed ID: 19995158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Student performance and perceptions of a lecture-based course compared with the same course utilizing group discussion.
    Lake DA
    Phys Ther; 2001 Mar; 81(3):896-902. PubMed ID: 11268154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of passive and active learning on student preference and performance in an undergraduate basic science course.
    Minhas PS; Ghosh A; Swanzy L
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(4):200-7. PubMed ID: 22434661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum.
    FitzPatrick KA; Finn KE; Campisi J
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Sep; 35(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 21908838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students' learning experiences and outcomes.
    Marden NY; Ulman LG; Wilson FS; Velan GM
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Jun; 37(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23728137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Student interaction characteristics during collaborative group testing.
    Giuliodori MJ; Lujan HL; DiCarlo SE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19261757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Students' perception of a discussion-driven classroom environment in an upper-level ruminant nutrition course with small enrollment.
    Wattiaux MA; Crump P
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jan; 89(1):343-52. PubMed ID: 16357299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing biology majors from large lecture classes with TA-facilitated laboratories to those from small lecture classes with faculty-facilitated laboratories.
    Goodman BE; Koster KL; Redinius PL
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2005 Jun; 29(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 15905156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Student-centered physiology in high schools.
    Anjur SS
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Jun; 35(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 21652501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning in an introductory anatomy and physiology course with a diverse student population.
    Brown PJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Sep; 34(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 20826770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Engagement of students with lectures in biochemistry and pharmacology.
    Davis EA; Hodgson Y; Macaulay JO
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2012; 40(5):300-9. PubMed ID: 22987551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment outcome is weakly correlated with lecture attendance: influence of learning style and use of alternative materials.
    Horton DM; Wiederman SD; Saint DA
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2012 Jun; 36(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 22665425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pre-athletic training students perform better on written tests with teacher-centered instruction.
    Livecchi NM; Merrick MA; Ingersoll CD; Stemmans CL
    J Allied Health; 2004; 33(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 15503754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of online formative assessment upon student learning in biomedical science courses.
    Olson BL; McDonald JL
    J Dent Educ; 2004 Jun; 68(6):656-9. PubMed ID: 15217084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-managed learning groups in higher education: students' perceptions of process and outcomes.
    Lizzio A; Wilson K
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2005 Sep; 75(Pt 3):373-90. PubMed ID: 16238872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technology support in nursing education: clickers in the classroom.
    Berry J
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2009; 30(5):295-8. PubMed ID: 19824239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 64.