These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19261868)

  • 41. Forgetting cues are ineffective in promoting forgetting in the item-method directed forgetting paradigm.
    Gao H; Qi M; Zhang Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Oct; 144():25-33. PubMed ID: 31377379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Forgetting positive social feedback is difficult: ERP evidence in a directed forgetting paradigm.
    Xie H; Hu X; Mo L; Zhang D
    Psychophysiology; 2021 May; 58(5):e13790. PubMed ID: 33569800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Event-related potential correlates of serial-position effects during an elaborative memory test.
    Rushby JA; Barry RJ; Johnstone SS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2002 Oct; 46(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 12374643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: enhancing familiarity based remembering.
    Rhodes SM; Donaldson DI
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):412-24. PubMed ID: 16930640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Control mechanisms mediating shifts of attention in auditory and visual space: a spatio-temporal ERP analysis.
    Green JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McDonald JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):358-69. PubMed ID: 16075294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. On the sensitivity of event-related potentials to retrieval mode.
    Williams AN; Wilding EL
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103580. PubMed ID: 31255886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Unconscious memory suppression.
    Salvador A; Berkovitch L; Vinckier F; Cohen L; Naccache L; Dehaene S; Gaillard R
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():191-199. PubMed ID: 30075345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Brain and behavioral indices of retrieval mode.
    Herron JE; Wilding EL
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):863-70. PubMed ID: 16698287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression.
    Hämmerer D; Li SC; Müller V; Lindenberger U
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3305-16. PubMed ID: 20638396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Left parietal activation related to planning, executing and suppressing praxis hand movements.
    Wheaton L; Fridman E; Bohlhalter S; Vorbach S; Hallett M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):980-6. PubMed ID: 19345141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The free choice whether or not to respond after stimulus presentation.
    Karch S; Mulert C; Thalmeier T; Lutz J; Leicht G; Meindl T; Möller HJ; Jäger L; Pogarell O
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2971-85. PubMed ID: 19172643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Event-related potential correlates of the retrieval of emotional and nonemotional context.
    Smith AP; Dolan RJ; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):760-75. PubMed ID: 15200704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. To think or not to think, that is the question: individual differences in suppression and rebound effects in autobiographical memory.
    Noreen S; MacLeod MD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():84-97. PubMed ID: 24309017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Multimodal feature binding in object memory retrieval using event-related potentials: Implications for models of semantic memory.
    Chiang HS; Spence JS; Eroh JT; Maguire MJ; Kraut MA; Hart J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jul; 153():116-126. PubMed ID: 32389620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Intact recollection memory in high-performing older adults: ERP and behavioral evidence.
    Duarte A; Ranganath C; Trujillo C; Knight RT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 16417681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Age-related changes in fronto-parietal networks during spatial memory: an ERP study.
    Müller NG; Knight RT
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 13(2):221-34. PubMed ID: 11958965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Intending to forget is not easy: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Gao H; Cao B; Zhang Q; Qi M; Li F; Li H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jun; 104():1-9. PubMed ID: 27021846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The impact of change in stimulus format on the electrophysiological indices of recognition.
    Schloerscheidt AM; Rugg MD
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 14728919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Differential effects of aging on processes underlying task switching.
    West R; Travers S
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 18403080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.