101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19262282)
1. Water-equivalent oral contrast agents in dual-modality PET/computed tomography scanning: does a little barium make the difference?
Kinner S; Veit-Haibach P; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Antoch G
Nucl Med Commun; 2009 Mar; 30(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 19262282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: introduction and evaluation.
Antoch G; Kuehl H; Kanja J; Lauenstein TC; Schneemann H; Hauth E; Jentzen W; Beyer T; Goehde SC; Debatin JF
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):879-85. PubMed ID: 14764889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of low-density neutral oral contrast material in PET/CT for tumor imaging: results of a randomized clinical trial.
Otero HJ; Yap JT; Patak MA; Erturk SM; Israel DA; Johnston CJ; Sakellis C; Rybicki FJ; Van den Abbeele AD; Ros PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 19620427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT enterography: Mannitol versus VoLumen.
Wong J; Moore H; Roger M; McKee C
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Oct; 60(5):593-598. PubMed ID: 27469175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Water as a contrast medium: a re-evaluation using the multidetector-row computed tomography.
Makarawo TP; Negussie E; Malde S; Tilak J; Gayagoy J; Watson J; Francis F; Lincoln D; Jacobs MJ
Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23816008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose optimization of mannitol solution for small bowel distension in MRI.
Ajaj W; Goehde SC; Schneemann H; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Lauenstein TC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Oct; 20(4):648-53. PubMed ID: 15390230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oral contrast agents for small bowel distension in MRI: influence of the osmolarity for small bowel distention.
Ajaj W; Goyen M; Schneemann H; Kuehle C; Nuefer M; Ruehm SG; Goehde SC; Lauenstein TC
Eur Radiol; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1400-6. PubMed ID: 15754160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT.
Megibow AJ; Babb JS; Hecht EM; Cho JJ; Houston C; Boruch MM; Williams AB
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 16293806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gastrointestinal tract labeling for MDCT of abdomen: comparison of low density barium and low density barium in combination with water.
Gulati K; Shah ZK; Sainani N; Uppot R; Sahani DV
Eur Radiol; 2008 May; 18(5):868-73. PubMed ID: 18183403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the effect of positive and negative oral contrast agents on (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan.
Sun XG; Huang G; Liu JJ; Wan LR
Hell J Nucl Med; 2009; 12(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 19675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial experience with oral contrast in PET/CT: phantom and clinical studies.
Cohade C; Osman M; Nakamoto Y; Marshall LT; Links JM; Fishman EK; Wahl RL
J Nucl Med; 2003 Mar; 44(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 12621008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 2 different protocols for ingestion of low-attenuating oral contrast agent for multidetector computed tomography of the abdomen.
Meindl TM; Hagl E; Reiser MF; Mueller-Lisse UG
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 17414757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
Koo CW; Shah-Patel LR; Baer JW; Frager DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of bowel distension and mural visualisation using neutral oral contrast agents for multidetector-row computed tomography.
Lim BK; Bux SI; Rahmat K; Lam SY; Liew YW
Singapore Med J; 2012 Nov; 53(11):732-6. PubMed ID: 23192500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydro-MRI of the small bowel: effect of contrast volume, timing of contrast administration, and data acquisition on bowel distention.
Kuehle CA; Ajaj W; Ladd SC; Massing S; Barkhausen J; Lauenstein TC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):W375-85. PubMed ID: 16985108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the effects of oral water and low-density barium sulphate suspension on bowel appearance on FDG-PET/CT.
Blake MA; Setty BN; Cronin CG; Kalra M; Holalkere NS; Fischman AJ; Mueller PR; Sahani DV
Eur Radiol; 2010 Jan; 20(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 19680659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correction for oral contrast artifacts in CT attenuation-corrected PET images obtained by combined PET/CT.
Nehmeh SA; Erdi YE; Kalaigian H; Kolbert KS; Pan T; Yeung H; Squire O; Sinha A; Larson SM; Humm JL
J Nucl Med; 2003 Dec; 44(12):1940-4. PubMed ID: 14660720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of bowel distension and bowel wall visualization according to patient positions during administration of oral contrast media for CT enterography.
Lee SB; Kim SH; Son JH; Baik JY
Br J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 90(1080):20170352. PubMed ID: 28972790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension.
Ajaj W; Goehde SC; Schneemann H; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Lauenstein TC
Eur Radiol; 2004 Mar; 14(3):458-64. PubMed ID: 14634782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of two neutral oral contrast agents in CT enterography.
Wong J; Roger M; Moore H
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Feb; 59(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25345816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
