170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19263540)
1. Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability.
Arthanat S; Bauer SM; Lenker JA; Nochajski SM; Wu YW
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2007 Jul; 2(4):235-48. PubMed ID: 19263540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring usability of assistive technology from a multicontextual perspective: the case of power wheelchairs.
Arthanat S; Nochajski SM; Lenker JA; Bauer SM; Wu YW
Am J Occup Ther; 2009; 63(6):751-64. PubMed ID: 20092111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geospatial assistive technologies: potential usability criteria identified from manual wheelchair users.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Nov; 15(8):844-855. PubMed ID: 31226889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Usability of a navigation application for travel in Quebec City with wheeled mobility device and, further validation of the Evaluation of satisfaction with geospatial assistive technology.
Vincent C; Levac S; Dumont F; Archambault PS; Routhier F; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Feb; 19(2):367-382. PubMed ID: 35730247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA; Routhier F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):119-131. PubMed ID: 30663444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Development, construction, and content validation of a questionnaire to test mobile shower commode usability.
Friesen EL; Theodoros DG; Russell TG
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil; 2015; 21(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 25762862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assistive device with conventional, alternative, and brain-computer interface inputs to enhance interaction with the environment for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a feasibility and usability study.
Schettini F; Riccio A; Simione L; Liberati G; Caruso M; Frasca V; Calabrese B; Mecella M; Pizzimenti A; Inghilleri M; Mattia D; Cincotti F
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 96(3 Suppl):S46-53. PubMed ID: 25721547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid P300-based brain-computer interface to improve usability for people with severe motor disability: electromyographic signals for error correction during a spelling task.
Riccio A; Holz EM; Aricò P; Leotta F; Aloise F; Desideri L; Rimondini M; Kübler A; Mattia D; Cincotti F
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 96(3 Suppl):S54-61. PubMed ID: 25721548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of satisfaction with geospatial assistive technology (ESGAT): a methodological and usability study.
Vincent C; Girard R; Dumont F; Archambault P; Routhier F; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Feb; 17(2):134-151. PubMed ID: 32501781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and validity of the usability scale for assistive technology for computer access: a preliminary study using video-based evaluation.
Gosselin LR; Arthanat S
Assist Technol; 2021 Nov; 33(6):350-356. PubMed ID: 31509089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): the development of the Taiwanese version.
Mao HF; Chen WY; Yao G; Huang SL; Lin CC; Huang WN
Clin Rehabil; 2010 May; 24(5):412-21. PubMed ID: 20442253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the Assistive Technology Professional on the Provision of Mobility Assistive Equipment.
Schein RM; Yang A; McKernan GP; Mesoros M; Pramana G; Schmeler MR; Dicianno BE
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Oct; 102(10):1895-1901. PubMed ID: 33891909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-cultural adaptation of the assistive technology device - Predisposition assessment (ATD PA) for use in Brazil (ATD PA Br).
Alves AC; Matsukura TS; Scherer MJ
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Feb; 12(2):160-164. PubMed ID: 27882819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the Functionality and Usability of Two Novel Wheelchair Anti-Rollback Devices for Ramp Ascent in Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury.
Deems-Dluhy SL; Jayaraman C; Green S; Albert MV; Jayaraman A
PM R; 2017 May; 9(5):483-493. PubMed ID: 27664403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A User-Centred Approach Exploring the Potential of a Novel EMG Switch for Control of Assistive Technology.
Judge S; Nasr N; Hawley M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 242():381-384. PubMed ID: 28873827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process-A systematic review.
Larsson Ranada Å; Lidström H
Assist Technol; 2019; 31(2):82-97. PubMed ID: 28892461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pruning a decision tree for selecting computer-related assistive devices for people with disabilities.
Chi CF; Tseng LK; Jang Y
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 Jul; 20(4):564-73. PubMed ID: 22552588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of mobility assistive technology devices on participation for individuals with disabilities.
Carver J; Ganus A; Ivey JM; Plummer T; Eubank A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Aug; 11(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 25815679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes.
Fuhrer MJ; Jutai JW; Scherer MJ; DeRuyter F
Disabil Rehabil; 2003 Nov; 25(22):1243-51. PubMed ID: 14617441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A conceptual framework of outcomes for caregivers of assistive technology users.
Demers L; Fuhrer MJ; Jutai J; Lenker J; Depa M; De Ruyter F
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Aug; 88(8):645-55; quiz 656-8, 691. PubMed ID: 19620830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
