These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19263565)

  • 1. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics.
    Biddiss E; Beaton D; Chau T
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2007 Nov; 2(6):346-57. PubMed ID: 19263565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment.
    Biddiss E; Chau T
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Dec; 86(12):977-87. PubMed ID: 18090439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards assessing the preferred usage features of upper limb prostheses: most important items regarding prosthesis use in people with major unilateral upper limb absence-a Dutch national survey.
    Kerver N; van der Sluis CK; van Twillert S; Krabbe PFM
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 44(24):7554-7565. PubMed ID: 34813394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A survey on what Australians with upper limb difference want in a prosthesis: justification for using soft robotics and additive manufacturing for customized prosthetic hands.
    Stephens-Fripp B; Jean Walker M; Goddard E; Alici G
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Apr; 15(3):342-349. PubMed ID: 30856031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic evaluation of upper limb prostheses in the Netherlands including the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip versus standard myoelectric hand prostheses.
    Kerver N; Karssies E; Krabbe PFM; van der Sluis CK; Groen H
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Dec; 45(25):4311-4321. PubMed ID: 36533430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implications of prosthesis funding structures on the use of prostheses: experiences of individuals with upper limb absence.
    Biddiss E; McKeever P; Lindsay S; Chau T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 21515898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remote fitting procedures for upper limb 3d printed prostheses.
    Zuniga JM; Young KJ; Peck JL; Srivastava R; Pierce JE; Dudley DR; Salazar DA; Bergmann J
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2019 Mar; 16(3):257-266. PubMed ID: 30661413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multivariate prediction of upper limb prosthesis acceptance or rejection.
    Biddiss EA; Chau TT
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2008 Jul; 3(4):181-92. PubMed ID: 19238719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques.
    Engdahl SM; Christie BP; Kelly B; Davis A; Chestek CA; Gates DH
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():53. PubMed ID: 26071402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PARTICIPATORY DESIGN OF PEDIATRIC UPPER LIMB PROSTHESES: QUALITATIVE METHODS AND PROTOTYPING.
    Sims T; Cranny A; Metcalf C; Chappell P; Donovan-Hall M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(6):629-637. PubMed ID: 28874215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dielectric elastomers as actuators for upper limb prosthetics: challenges and opportunities.
    Biddiss E; Chau T
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 May; 30(4):403-18. PubMed ID: 17632030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priorities for the design and control of upper limb prostheses: A focus group study.
    Zheng JY; Kalpakjian C; Larrága-Martínez M; Chestek CA; Gates DH
    Disabil Health J; 2019 Oct; 12(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 30952491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years.
    Biddiss EA; Chau TT
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Sep; 31(3):236-57. PubMed ID: 17979010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical application study of externally powered upper-limb prosthetics systems: the VA elbow, the VA hand, and the VA/NU myoelectric hand systems.
    Lewis EA; Sheredos CR; Sowell TT; Houston VL
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):51-136. PubMed ID: 776301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comfort and function remain key factors in upper limb prosthetic abandonment: findings of a scoping review.
    Smail LC; Neal C; Wilkins C; Packham TL
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Nov; 16(8):821-830. PubMed ID: 32189537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cyborg beast: a low-cost 3d-printed prosthetic hand for children with upper-limb differences.
    Zuniga J; Katsavelis D; Peck J; Stollberg J; Petrykowski M; Carson A; Fernandez C
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Jan; 8():10. PubMed ID: 25601104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A survey of overuse problems in patients with acquired or congenital upper limb deficiency.
    Burger H; Vidmar G
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Aug; 40(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 26023075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptions of cosmesis and function in adults with upper limb prostheses: a systematic literature review.
    Ritchie S; Wiggins S; Sanford A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):332-41. PubMed ID: 21960052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Upper limb activity in myoelectric prosthesis users is biased towards the intact limb and appears unrelated to goal-directed task performance.
    Chadwell A; Kenney L; Granat MH; Thies S; Head J; Galpin A; Baker R; Kulkarni J
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):11084. PubMed ID: 30038402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.