229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19263573)
1. Effect of modular neck variation on bone and cement mantle mechanics around a total hip arthroplasty stem.
Simpson DJ; Little JP; Gray H; Murray DW; Gill HS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Mar; 24(3):274-85. PubMed ID: 19263573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants.
Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ
J Biomech Eng; 2001 Dec; 123(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11783734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity analysis of a cemented hip stem to implant position and cement mantle thickness.
Shi J; Browne M; Strickland M; Flivik G; Taylor M
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014 Nov; 17(15):1671-84. PubMed ID: 23405986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of a "rim cutter" device and a flanged cup for improving the mantle of the acetabular component of a cemented Exeter total hip arthroplasty.
Fernández-Valencia JÁ; Gallart X; Bori G; Rodríguez-Roiz JM; Combalia A
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Dec; 26(8):891-894. PubMed ID: 27549660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deformation pattern and load transfer of an uncemented femoral stem with modular necks. An experimental study in human cadaver femurs.
Enoksen CH; Gjerdet NR; Klaksvik J; Arthursson AJ; Schnell-Husby O; Wik TS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():28-33. PubMed ID: 26785385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of undersizing on the long-term stability of the Exeter hip stem: A comparative in vitro study.
Cristofolini L; Erani P; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Ohashi H; Iida S; Minato I; Viceconti M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Nov; 25(9):899-908. PubMed ID: 20659780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing.
Jeffers JR; Browne M; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Taylor M
J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 17070816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modelling the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements: experimental and finite element methods.
Waide V; Cristofolini L; Stolk J; Verdonschot N; Boogaard GJ; Toni A
J Biomech; 2004 Jan; 37(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 14672564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Cnudde PH; Kärrholm J; Rolfson O; Timperley AJ; Mohaddes M
Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):27-32. PubMed ID: 28363891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element-based preclinical testing of cemented total hip implants.
Stolk J; Janssen D; Huiskes R; Verdonschot N
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 456():138-47. PubMed ID: 17075379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component.
Estok DM; Orr TE; Harris WH
J Arthroplasty; 1997 Jan; 12(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 9021500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone creep and short and long term subsidence after cemented stem total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Norman TL; Shultz T; Noble G; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
J Biomech; 2013 Mar; 46(5):949-55. PubMed ID: 23357700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The importance of proximal cement filling of the calcar region: a biomechanical justification.
Ayers D; Mann K
J Arthroplasty; 2003 Oct; 18(7 Suppl 1):103-9. PubMed ID: 14560418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fourteen-year experience with short cemented stems in total hip replacement.
Santori N; Falez F; Potestio D; Santori FS
Int Orthop; 2019 Jan; 43(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 30411248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of femoral neck length, stem size, and body weight on strains in the proximal cement mantle.
Harrington MA; O'Connor DO; Lozynsky AJ; Kovach I; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 11940617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between cement fatigue damage and implant surface finish in proximal femoral prostheses.
Lennon AB; McCormack BA; Prendergast PJ
Med Eng Phys; 2003 Dec; 25(10):833-41. PubMed ID: 14630471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element and experimental models of cemented hip joint reconstructions can produce similar bone and cement strains in pre-clinical tests.
Stolk J; Verdonschot N; Cristofolini L; Toni A; Huiskes R
J Biomech; 2002 Apr; 35(4):499-510. PubMed ID: 11934419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
