153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19264237)
1. Public reporting of quality measures what are we trying to accomplish?
Califf RM; Peterson ED
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 53(10):831-3. PubMed ID: 19264237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of care in myocardial revascularization procedures.
Eldar R
Croat Med J; 2002 Dec; 43(6):727-30. PubMed ID: 12476484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How appropriate for assessing quality are the 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization?
Klein LW
J Invasive Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 21(11):558-62. PubMed ID: 19901408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2007 update of the clinical competence statement on cardiac interventional procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (writing Committee to Update the 1998 Clinical Competence Statement on Recommendations for the Assessment and Maintenance of Proficiency in Coronary Interventional Procedures).
King SB; Aversano T; Ballard WL; Beekman RH; Cowley MJ; Ellis SG; Faxon DP; Hannan EL; Hirshfeld JW; Jacobs AK; Kellett MA; Kimmel SE; Landzberg JS; McKeever LS; Moscucci M; Pomerantz RM; Smith KM; Vetrovec GW; Creager MA; Hirshfeld JW; Holmes DR; Newby LK; Weitz HH; Merli G; Piña I; Rodgers GP; Tracy CM; ; ;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 50(1):82-108. PubMed ID: 17601554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the risk of coronary surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Weintraub WS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 47(3):669-71. PubMed ID: 16458153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Top performers in heart surgery.
Mathias JM
OR Manager; 1999 Jul; 15(7):24-5, 27. PubMed ID: 10539070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Taking the measure of clinical care.
O'Connor GT
Can J Cardiol; 2003 Jun; 19(7):771-3. PubMed ID: 12813609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Coronary surgery at county hospitals is of high quality].
Pettersson S; Stjerna A; Almgren SO
Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(13):1592-4. PubMed ID: 10218342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Using administrative data to assess health care outcomes.
Ayanian JZ
Eur Heart J; 1999 Dec; 20(23):1689-91. PubMed ID: 10562474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Hartford project sheds light on cardiovascular care.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1991; 11(5):8. PubMed ID: 10120875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring percutaneous coronary intervention quality by simple case volume.
Kuntz RE; Normand SL
Circulation; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1088-91. PubMed ID: 16116067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Standards for high-risk surgeries would save lives, study says.
Levenson D
Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2004 Jul; 15(13):7-9. PubMed ID: 15272488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac study shows wide performance gaps.
Healthc Benchmarks; 2001 Sep; 8(9):100-2, 97. PubMed ID: 11561376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stents or surgery? New data on the comparative outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Hlatky MA; Bravata DM
Circulation; 2008 Jul; 118(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 18645064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2007 update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Cardiac Interventional Procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Update the 1998 Clinical Competence Statement on Recommendations for the Assessment and Maintenance of Proficiency in Coronary Interventional Procedures).
; King SB; Aversano T; Ballard WL; Beekman RH; Cowley MJ; Ellis SG; Faxon DP; Hannan EL; Hirshfeld JW; Jacobs AK; Kellett MA; Kimmel SE; Landzberg JS; McKeever LS; Moscucci M; Pomerantz RM; Smith KM; Vetrovec GW; Creager MA; Holmes DR; Newby LK; Weitz HH; Merli G; Piña I; Rodgers GP; Tracy CM
Circulation; 2007 Jul; 116(1):98-124. PubMed ID: 17592076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Michigan consortium outlines multiple quality improvement findings for percutaneous coronary interventions.
Rollins G
Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res; 2003 Dec; 14(24):9-10, 12. PubMed ID: 14677565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The big chill: the deleterious effects of public reporting on access to health care for the sickest patients.
Turi ZG
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(11):1766-8. PubMed ID: 15936603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing quality and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention: choosing statistical models, outcomes, time periods, and patient populations.
Hannan EL; Wu C
Am Heart J; 2003 Apr; 145(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 12679749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Study raises concerns on public reporting of data.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2005 Aug; 12(8):88-9. PubMed ID: 16101211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly.
Chassin MR; Hannan EL; DeBuono BA
N Engl J Med; 1996 Feb; 334(6):394-8. PubMed ID: 8538714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
