1191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19264353)
1. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.
Quaas S; Rudolph H; Luthardt RG
J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):903-8. PubMed ID: 17980951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology.
Persson AS; Andersson M; Odén A; Sandborgh-Englund G
Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1123-30. PubMed ID: 18336900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data.
Chen Z; Li Y; Deng X; Wang X
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 24118182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner.
Persson A; Andersson M; Oden A; Sandborgh-Englund G
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 16543016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
Ender A; Mehl A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of dental arch reproduction using three-dimensional optical digitization.
Brosky ME; Major RJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov; 90(5):434-40. PubMed ID: 14586306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Qualitative computer aided evaluation of dental impressions in vivo.
Luthardt RG; Koch R; Rudolph H; Walter MH
Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 16040117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques.
Shah S; Sundaram G; Bartlett D; Sherriff M
J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):653-8. PubMed ID: 15476960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling.
Syrek A; Reich G; Ranftl D; Klein C; Cerny B; Brodesser J
J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of adding a stone base on the accuracy of working casts using different types of dental stone.
Al-Abidi K; Ellakwa A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):17-28. PubMed ID: 16957787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing.
Luthardt RG; Bornemann G; Lemelson S; Walter MH; Hüls A
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(6):680-5. PubMed ID: 15686096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer copings for partial coverage.
Denissen H; van der Zel J; Reisig J; Vlaar S; de Ruiter W; van Waas R
Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Apr; 2(2):113-27. PubMed ID: 11351490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
