These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Research ethics. Certificates of confidentiality and compelled disclosure of data. Beskow LM; Dame L; Costello EJ Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5904):1054-5. PubMed ID: 19008431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use and disclosure of protected health information for research under the HIPAA privacy rule: unrealized patient autonomy and burdensome government regulation. Tovino SA S D Law Rev; 2004; 49(3):447-502. PubMed ID: 16493842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient consent in the era of de-identified research databases. Anderson JR; Schonfeld TL J Clin Oncol; 2006 Feb; 24(4):720-1. PubMed ID: 16446347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidental findings: a common law approach. Tovino SA Account Res; 2008; 15(4):242-61. PubMed ID: 18972265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Certificates of confidentiality and informed consent: perspectives of IRB chairs and institutional legal counsel. Check DK; Wolf LE; Dame LA; Beskow LM IRB; 2014; 36(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24649737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Confidentiality certificates and privacy of research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 May; 17(5):3. PubMed ID: 12708410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Moore revisited: state-sponsored biotechnological research and the takings clause. Orlando M Whittier Law Rev; 2001; 23(2):437-65. PubMed ID: 12774777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigator financial disclosures and its effect on research subjects. Gibbs JN; Guagnano GA Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(4):727-37. PubMed ID: 18557228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethics in action. What the family needs to know. Haddad A RN; 2007 Nov; 70(11):23. PubMed ID: 18232117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Research Information for Reasonable People. Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 2018 Nov; 48(6):3-4. PubMed ID: 30586182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. US agencies plan research-ethics overhaul. Ledford H Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7568):166. PubMed ID: 26354461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A therapeutic jurisprudence perspective on participation in research by subjects with reduced capacity to consent: a comment on Kim and Appelbaum. Winick BJ; Goodman KW Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 16883619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The right of subjects to see the protocol. Veatch RM IRB; 2002; 24(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 12737168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: patients, property rights, and public policy. Biagi KG St Louis Univ Law J; 1991; 35(2):433-62. PubMed ID: 16144099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Research ethics in a perspective of developing countries]. Aagaard-Hansen J; Johansen MV; Riis P Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Jun; 166(24):2345-7. PubMed ID: 15281574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. University says research subjects' family members are not research subjects too. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Feb; 20(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 15839006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]