These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19265004)
1. Scientific integrity. Responding to possible plagiarism. Long TC; Errami M; George AC; Sun Z; Garner HR Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1293-4. PubMed ID: 19265004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Publication ethics: Its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2012 Jan; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22243674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs; 2012 Feb; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22299799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession. Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2012 Jan; 48(1):1. PubMed ID: 22188040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail. Couzin J; Unger K Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Plagiarism, retraction and the future. Van Steirteghem A; Williams AC Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):1940. PubMed ID: 21764906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct. Retractions put spotlight on China's part-time professor system. Xin H Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1280-1. PubMed ID: 19264995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem? Berg AO Fam Med; 1990; 22(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2182360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? Steen RG J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry publication standards of ethical conduct. Lefebvre CA; Lang BR J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 15798678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Spoof research paper is accepted by 157 journals. Hawkes N BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5975. PubMed ID: 24096966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Copy is fraudulent--but what is the consequence?]. Nielsen OH; Schroeder TV Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Nov; 168(45):3891. PubMed ID: 17118247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How to Act When Research Misconduct Is Not Detected by Software but Revealed by the Author of the Plagiarized Article. Baydik OD; Gasparyan AY J Korean Med Sci; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1508-10. PubMed ID: 27550475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Steen RG J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research. Freedman JE Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retracted science and the retraction index. Fang FC; Casadevall A Infect Immun; 2011 Oct; 79(10):3855-9. PubMed ID: 21825063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Journal of Pathology's approach to publication ethics and misconduct. Hall PA; Wixon J; Poulsom R J Pathol; 2011 Mar; 223(4):447-9. PubMed ID: 21294118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative]. Werkö L Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]