123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19265255)
21. Clinical use of an insert earphone.
Clemis JD; Ballad WJ; Killion MC
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):520-4. PubMed ID: 3767222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5.
Rodríguez Valiente A; García Berrocal JR; Roldán Fidalgo A; Trinidad A; Ramírez Camacho R
Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):595-603. PubMed ID: 24793886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones.
Lindgren F
Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2336535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of insert earphones for high-frequency bedside ototoxicity monitoring.
Gordon JS; Phillips DS; Helt WJ; Konrad-Martin D; Fausti SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 16187247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Examination of Insert Ear Interaural Attenuation (IA)Values in Audiological Evaluations.
Gumus NM; Gumus M; Unsal S; Yuksel M; Gunduz M
Clin Invest Med; 2016 Dec; 39(6):27507. PubMed ID: 27917798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of background noise on earphone thresholds.
Frank T; Williams DL
J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 8318711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
Small SA; Hu N
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability of computer-automated hearing thresholds in cochlear-impaired listeners using ER-4B Canal Phone earphones.
Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 14582529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of the transducers on paediatric thresholds estimated with auditory steady-state responses.
Bakhos D; Vitaux H; Villeneuve A; Kim S; Lescanne E; Pigeon V; Aoustin JM; Bordure P; Galvin J
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 273(8):2019-26. PubMed ID: 26329899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Insert earphone depth and the occlusion effect.
Dean MS; Martin FN
Am J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 9(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 11200189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validity and reliability of in-situ air conduction thresholds measured through hearing aids coupled to closed and open instant-fit tips.
O'Brien A; Keidser G; Yeend I; Hartley L; Dillon H
Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):868-76. PubMed ID: 20812890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Audiometric Thresholds: Stimulus Considerations in Sound Field and Under Earphones.
Norrix LW; Anderson A
Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 26650376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Residual Hearing: Comparison With Audiometric Thresholds.
Koka K; Saoji AA; Litvak LM
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):e161-e167. PubMed ID: 27879487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Insert earphones for audiometry: applications, advantages, and limitations.
Luks SB; Borton TE; Nolen BL
Entechnology; 1989 Sep; ():21-2, 24, 28-30. PubMed ID: 2692634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones.
Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Shera CA; Peake WT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1548-65. PubMed ID: 10738809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Test-retest reliability of in situ unaided thresholds in adults.
Smith-Olinde L; Nicholson N; Chivers C; Highley P; Williams DK
Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 16803794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of the type of acoustic transducer in pure-tone audiometry.
Born NM; Marciano MDS; Mass SDC; Silva DPCD; Scharlach RC
Codas; 2022; 34(3):e20210019. PubMed ID: 35019084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
