149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19265786)
1. Improving auscultatory blood pressure measurement with electronic and computer technology: the visual auscultation method.
Wang Y; She J; Xiang H; Li Y; Liu J; Li D; Yu M
Am J Hypertens; 2009 Jun; 22(6):624-9. PubMed ID: 19265786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nexfin noninvasive continuous blood pressure validated against Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff.
Eeftinck Schattenkerk DW; van Lieshout JJ; van den Meiracker AH; Wesseling KR; Blanc S; Wieling W; van Montfrans GA; Settels JJ; Wesseling KH; Westerhof BE
Am J Hypertens; 2009 Apr; 22(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 19180062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relative accuracy of simultaneous same arm, simultaneous opposite arm and sequential same arm measurements in the validation of automated blood pressure measuring devices.
Atkins N; Mee F; O'Malley K; O'Brien E
J Hum Hypertens; 1990 Dec; 4(6):647-9. PubMed ID: 2096206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the SCHILLER BR-102 plus noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the International Protocol introduced by the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension.
Denchev SV; Simova II; Matveev MG
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 17890972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Omron F3 blood pressure measuring device for use in the finger through simultaneous invasive comparative measurements according to the German Institute for Validation (DIN) 58130 protocol.
Eckert S; Mannebach H; Gleichmann U
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):347-51. PubMed ID: 10212376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cardiovascular monitoring system in conscious cynomolgus monkeys for regulatory safety pharmacology. Part 1: Non-pharmacological validation.
Authier S; Tanguay JF; Gauvin D; Di Fruscia R; Fournier S; Chaurand F; Troncy E
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2007; 56(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17587601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auscultatory blood pressure measurement--effect of pressure on the head of the stethoscope.
Londe S; Klitzner TS
West J Med; 1984 Aug; 141(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 6495724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A comparison of intra-arterial, oscillometric and auscultatory measurements of blood pressure--influence of blood pressure level and arteriosclerosis].
Goh R; Saito T; Arase T; Higuchi S
Masui; 1988 Feb; 37(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 3373729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol.
Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Protogerou A; Nasothimiou E; Kapralos C
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Oct; 13(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18799957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Systolic blood pressure at rest and during submaximal and maximal exercise on ergometer bicycle. The value of automatic and auscultatory determination].
Petersen JR; Drabaek H; Mehlsen J; Haedersdal C; Møller ML
Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Mar; 155(9):631-5. PubMed ID: 8447031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the accuracy of blood pressure measurement correlate with hearing loss of the observer?
Song S; Lee J; Chee Y; Jang DP; Kim IY
Blood Press Monit; 2014 Feb; 19(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 24361920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative Assessment of Blood Pressure Measurement Accuracy and Variability from Visual Auscultation Method by Observers without Receiving Medical Training.
Chen W; Chen F; Feng Y; Chen A; Zheng D
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():3537079. PubMed ID: 29423405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Artsana CS 410 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Natalizi A; Gerosa PF; Frigerio M; Omboni S; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 18496297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of the HoMedics BPA-300, a home blood pressure monitor using the auscultatory method.
Yarows SA
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 17890974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the HEM-780REL with easy wrap cuff for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
Viera AJ; Hinderliter AL
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):335-8. PubMed ID: 17890973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
