These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19265786)

  • 21. [Automatic measure of arterial pressure using the oscillometric method (Dynamap 845)].
    Debru JL; Doyon B; Morin B; Mallion JM; Cau G
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Jun; 74 Spec No():125-9. PubMed ID: 6794525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New clinical validation method for automated sphygmomanometer: a proposal by Japan ISO-WG for sphygmomanometer standard.
    Shirasaki O; Asou Y; Takahashi Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Dec; 12(6):381-3. PubMed ID: 18277315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Short-term variation in blood pressure determines the accuracy of simultaneous and sequential recordings in the validation of blood pressure measuring devices.
    Schwan A; Jonsson D
    J Hum Hypertens; 1993 Aug; 7(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 8410921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of the A&D UM-101 professional hybrid device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
    Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Gkinos CP; Tzamouranis DG
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 18199922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Simultaneous auscultatory and visual measurement of the blood pressure. A comparative trial by physicians and clinical assistants].
    Kristensen BO; Berthelsen JG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1975 Mar; 137(13):715-9. PubMed ID: 1135964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Discarding the first of three nurse-auscultatory or oscillometric blood pressure measurements does not improve the association of office blood pressure with ABPM.
    Graves JW; Grossardt BR
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Jun; 15(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 20407368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Preliminary evaluation of the Profilomat, a new portable blood pressure recorder].
    Ganslmayer M; Perret F; Waeber B; Nussberger J; Brunner HR
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1992 Apr; 122(15):544-8. PubMed ID: 1566020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the Profilomat II ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
    Mee F; Atkins N; O'Brien E
    Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):353-61. PubMed ID: 10212377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
    Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correlation between objective automatic and auscultatory mercury manometer blood pressure measurements.
    Gonzalez Biosca MD; Fernandez-Cruz A; Mizushima S; Yamori Y
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1990; 16 Suppl 8():S26-7. PubMed ID: 1706023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Blood pressure assessment during resistance exercise: comparison between auscultation and Finapres.
    Polito MD; Farinatti PT; Lira VA; Nobrega AC
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 17353650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II.
    Tasker F; de Greeff A; Liu B; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 19417636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital recording system of sphygmomanometry.
    Lee J; Park D; Oh H; Kim I; Shen D; Chee Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Apr; 14(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 19305187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of two indirect methods of blood pressure measurement in ill patients.
    Rebenson-Piano M; Holm K; Foreman MD; Kirchhoff KT
    Nurs Res; 1989; 38(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 2911511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000.
    Tasker F; De Greeff A; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2010 Sep; 24(9):609-16. PubMed ID: 20107491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of clothes on sphygmomanometric and oscillometric blood pressure measurement.
    Liebl M; Holzgreve H; Schulz M; Crispin A; Bogner J
    Blood Press; 2004; 13(5):279-82. PubMed ID: 15545150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of three measures of the ankle-brachial blood pressure index in a general population.
    Pan CR; Staessen JA; Li Y; Wang JG
    Hypertens Res; 2007 Jun; 30(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 17664860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comparison of the automatic sphygmo-oscillographic and auscultation methods of blood pressure measurements].
    Sapiński A; Swidzińska S; Sapiński F
    Kardiol Pol; 1991; 34(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 2051710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Validation of electronic automatic-measurement arterial blood pressure devices].
    de Gaudemaris R; Asmar R; Girerd X; Mallion JM; Maitre A
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2000 Aug; 93(8):979-82. PubMed ID: 10989741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.