These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19266257)

  • 1. 64-Slice CT coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography: activity-based cost analysis.
    Stacul F; Sironi D; Grisi G; Belgrano M; Salvi A; Cova M
    Radiol Med; 2009 Mar; 114(2):239-52. PubMed ID: 19266257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease.
    Mowatt G; Cummins E; Waugh N; Walker S; Cook J; Jia X; Hillis GS; Fraser C
    Health Technol Assess; 2008 May; 12(17):iii-iv, ix-143. PubMed ID: 18462576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct costs and cost-effectiveness of dual-source computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease.
    Dorenkamp M; Bonaventura K; Sohns C; Becker CR; Leber AW
    Heart; 2012 Mar; 98(6):460-7. PubMed ID: 21846767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional invasive coronary angiography.
    Darlington M; Gueret P; Laissy JP; Pierucci AF; Maoulida H; Quelen C; Niarra R; Chatellier G; Durand-Zaleski I
    Eur J Health Econ; 2015 Jul; 16(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 24990117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of MDCT coronary angiography in the clinical setting: economic implications.
    Malagò R; Pezzato A; Barbiani C; Tavella D; Vallerio P; Pasini AF; Cominacini L; Mucelli RP
    Radiol Med; 2013 Dec; 118(8):1294-308. PubMed ID: 23716289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost effectiveness of coronary angiography and calcium scoring using CT and stress MRI for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Dewey M; Hamm B
    Eur Radiol; 2007 May; 17(5):1301-9. PubMed ID: 17031453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of multidetector computed tomography compared with myocardial perfusion imaging as gatekeeper to invasive coronary angiography in asymptomatic firefighters with positive treadmill tests.
    Budoff MJ; Karwasky R; Ahmadi N; Nasserian C; Pratt F; Stephens J; Chang WW; Flores FR; Rizzo JA; Gunnarsson CL; McKay CR
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 19818321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of the most common diagnostic methods for coronary artery disease].
    Dewey M; Hamm B
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jun; 129(25-26):1415-9. PubMed ID: 15213872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain.
    Khare RK; Courtney DM; Powell ES; Venkatesh AK; Lee TA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Jul; 15(7):623-32. PubMed ID: 19086322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT coronary angiography in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease: decision making from various perspectives in the face of uncertainty.
    Genders TS; Meijboom WB; Meijs MF; Schuijf JD; Mollet NR; Weustink AC; Pugliese F; Bax JJ; Cramer MJ; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ; Hunink MG
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):734-44. PubMed ID: 19864509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in patients with chest pain: Comparison with myocardial single photon emission tomography.
    Lee SP; Jang EJ; Kim YJ; Cha MJ; Park SY; Song HJ; Choi JE; Shim JI; Ahn J; Lee HJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 25977116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of follow-up of pulmonary nodules incidentally detected on cardiac computed tomographic angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Goehler A; McMahon PM; Lumish HS; Wu CC; Munshi V; Gilmore M; Chung JH; Ghoshhajra BB; Mark D; Truong QA; Gazelle GS; Hoffmann U
    Circulation; 2014 Aug; 130(8):668-75. PubMed ID: 25015342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The role of multidetector CT in cardiovascular diagnosis: the CT coronary angiography. Current applications].
    Volpe C; D'Acquisto A
    Recenti Prog Med; 2011 May; 102(5):193-5. PubMed ID: 21607002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the value of coronary artery computed tomography as the first-line anatomical test for stable patients with indications for invasive angiography due to suspected coronary artery disease. Initial cost analysis in the CAT-CAD randomized trial.
    Rudziński PN; Kruk M; Kępka C; Schoepf UJ; Otani K; Leonard TJ; Dębski M; Dzielińska Z; Pręgowski J; Witkowski A; Rużyłło W; Demkow M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(1):75-79. PubMed ID: 31780142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effective selection of patients for coronary angiography.
    Maddahi J; Gambhir SS
    J Nucl Cardiol; 1997; 4(2 Pt 2):S141-51. PubMed ID: 9115076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Costs and clinical outcomes after coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease: comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT.
    Min JK; Kang N; Shaw LJ; Devereux RB; Robinson M; Lin F; Legorreta AP; Gilmore A
    Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 18796668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The STRATEGY Study (Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for the Management of Symptomatic Revascularized Patients): Resources and Outcomes Impact.
    Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Rota C; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Fusini L; Solbiati A; Segurini C; Conte E; Gripari P; Annoni A; Formenti A; Petulla' M; Lombardi F; Muscogiuri G; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 27894070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremities: activity-based cost analysis.
    Stacul F; Pozzi-Mucelli F; Lubin E; Gava S; Cuttin-Zernich R; Grisi G; Cova MA
    Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 16623307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost of single-vessel and multivessel coronary drug-eluting stenting: comparison to the DRG funding level.
    Varani E; Balducelli M; Gatti C; Tesselli MR; Vecchi G; Maresta A
    Ital Heart J; 2005 Jan; 6(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 15773274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in episode-based care costs for multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus myocardial perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Min JK; Robinson M; Shaw LJ; Lin F; Legorreta AP; Gilmore A
    J Med Econ; 2008; 11(2):327-40. PubMed ID: 19450089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.