These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19266257)
21. Cost-effectiveness of coronary MDCT in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. Ladapo JA; Hoffmann U; Bamberg F; Nagurney JT; Cutler DM; Weinstein MC; Gazelle GS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 18647917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic evaluation strategies for individuals with stable chest pain syndrome and suspected coronary artery disease. Min JK; Gilmore A; Jones EC; Berman DS; Stuijfzand WJ; Shaw LJ; O'Day K; Danad I Clin Imaging; 2017; 43():97-105. PubMed ID: 28273654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of patients with chest pain. Ladapo JA; Jaffer FA; Hoffmann U; Thomson CC; Bamberg F; Dec W; Cutler DM; Weinstein MC; Gazelle GS J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 54(25):2409-22. PubMed ID: 20082932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion SPECT for evaluation of patients with chest pain and no known coronary artery disease. Min JK; Gilmore A; Budoff MJ; Berman DS; O'Day K Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):801-8. PubMed ID: 20177094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion imaging for near-term quality of life, cost and radiation exposure: a prospective multicenter randomized pilot trial. Min JK; Koduru S; Dunning AM; Cole JH; Hines JL; Greenwell D; Biga C; Fanning G; LaBounty TM; Gomez M; Horowitz JM; Hadimitzsky M; Hausleiter J; Callister TQ; Rosanski AR; Shaw LJ; Berman DS; Lin FY J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(4):274-83. PubMed ID: 22732201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The cost-effectiveness of diagnostic cardiac imaging for stable coronary artery disease. Turchetti G; Kroes MA; Lorenzoni V; Trieste L; Chapman AM; Sweet AC; Wilson GI; Neglia D Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015; 15(4):625-33. PubMed ID: 26027879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimizing CAD diagnosis in China with CT angiography. Cheng MM; Lu B; Hu SS; Marelli C; Higashi MK; Patel PA; Li J; Veenstra DL J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 19394919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-year outcomes and cost analysis in patients receiving 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography for chest pain. Fazel P; Peterman MA; Schussler JM Am J Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 104(4):498-500. PubMed ID: 19660601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A new algorithm for the management of stable coronary artery disease incorporating CT coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve: how we can improve outcomes and reduce costs. Comment. van Gaal WJ; Allman K Med J Aust; 2011 Jun; 194(12):667-8; author reply 669. PubMed ID: 21830345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality-of-Life and Economic Outcomes of Assessing Fractional Flow Reserve With Computed Tomography Angiography: PLATFORM. Hlatky MA; De Bruyne B; Pontone G; Patel MR; Norgaard BL; Byrne RA; Curzen N; Purcell I; Gutberlet M; Rioufol G; Hink U; Schuchlenz HW; Feuchtner G; Gilard M; Andreini D; Jensen JM; Hadamitzky M; Wilk A; Wang F; Rogers C; Douglas PS; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 66(21):2315-2323. PubMed ID: 26475205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost-effectiveness of 64-slice CT angiography compared to conventional coronary angiography based on a coverage with evidence development study in Ontario. Goeree R; Blackhouse G; Bowen JM; O'Reilly D; Sutherland S; Hopkins R; Chow B; Freeman M; Provost Y; Dennie C; Cohen E; Marcuzzi D; Iwanochko R; Moody A; Paul N; Parker JD Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2013 Oct; 13(5):675-90. PubMed ID: 24138652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pre-operative CT coronary angiography in patients with mitral valve prolapse referred for surgical repair: comparison of accuracy, radiation dose and cost versus invasive coronary angiography. Pontone G; Andreini D; Bertella E; Cortinovis S; Mushtaq S; Foti C; Annoni A; Formenti A; Baggiano A; Conte E; Ballerini G; Fiorentini C; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 167(6):2889-94. PubMed ID: 22959395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects on costs of frontline diagnostic evaluation in patients suspected of angina: coronary computed tomography angiography vs. conventional ischaemia testing. Nielsen LH; Olsen J; Markenvard J; Jensen JM; Nørgaard BL Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 May; 14(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 22922828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Andreini D; Pontone G; Pepi M; Ballerini G; Bartorelli AL; Magini A; Quaglia C; Nobili E; Agostoni P J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 May; 49(20):2044-50. PubMed ID: 17512361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. Goldstein JA; Chinnaiyan KM; Abidov A; Achenbach S; Berman DS; Hayes SW; Hoffmann U; Lesser JR; Mikati IA; O'Neil BJ; Shaw LJ; Shen MY; Valeti US; Raff GL; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 58(14):1414-22. PubMed ID: 21939822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Computed tomography versus invasive coronary angiography: design and methods of the pragmatic randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial. Napp AE; Haase R; Laule M; Schuetz GM; Rief M; Dreger H; Feuchtner G; Friedrich G; Špaček M; Suchánek V; Fuglsang Kofoed K; Engstroem T; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Gutberlet M; Woinke M; Maurovich-Horvat P; Merkely B; Donnelly P; Ball P; Dodd JD; Quinn M; Saba L; Porcu M; Francone M; Mancone M; Erglis A; Zvaigzne L; Jankauskas A; Sakalyte G; Harań T; Ilnicka-Suckiel M; Bettencourt N; Gama-Ribeiro V; Condrea S; Benedek I; Čemerlić Adjić N; Adjić O; Rodriguez-Palomares J; Garcia Del Blanco B; Roditi G; Berry C; Davis G; Thwaite E; Knuuti J; Pietilä M; Kępka C; Kruk M; Vidakovic R; Neskovic AN; Díez I; Lecumberri I; Geleijns J; Kubiak C; Strenge-Hesse A; Do TH; Frömel F; Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I; Benguria-Arrate G; Keiding H; Katzer C; Müller-Nordhorn J; Rieckmann N; Walther M; Schlattmann P; Dewey M; Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2957-2968. PubMed ID: 27864607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost-effectiveness analysis of stand-alone or combined non-invasive imaging tests for the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease: results from the EVINCI study. Lorenzoni V; Bellelli S; Caselli C; Knuuti J; Underwood SR; Neglia D; Turchetti G; Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Dec; 20(9):1437-1449. PubMed ID: 31410670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in suspected coronary artery disease: a net cost analysis and reimbursement implications. Pilz G; Patel PA; Fell U; Ladapo JA; Rizzo JA; Fang H; Gunnarsson C; Heer T; Hoefling B Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jan; 27(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 20524070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multidetector CT coronary angiography for patient triage to invasive coronary angiography: Performance and cost in ambulatory patients with equivocal or suspected inaccurate noninvasive stress tests. Menon M; Lesser JR; Hara H; Birkett R; Knickelbine T; Longe T; Flygenring B; Henry J; Schwartz R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Mar; 73(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 19229981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]