BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19266588)

  • 1. A prospective randomized evaluation of scar assessment measures.
    Brandt MG; Moore CC; Micomonaco D; Fung K; Franklin JH; Yoo J; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 19266588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of hypernasality.
    Whitehill TL; Lee AS; Chun JC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 14748640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?
    Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative and qualitative dermal change with microfat grafting of facial scars.
    Sardesai MG; Moore CC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Dec; 137(6):868-72. PubMed ID: 18036412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for evaluation of facial scars treated with self-drying silicone gel.
    Bianchi FA; Roccia F; Fiorini P; Berrone S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 20485035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
    Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
    Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
    van de Kar AL; Corion LU; Smeulders MJ; Draaijers LJ; van der Horst CM; van Zuijlen PP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Aug; 116(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 16079683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview.
    Idriss N; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19152571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective assessment of burn scar vascularity, erythema, pliability, thickness, and planimetry.
    Oliveira GV; Chinkes D; Mitchell C; Oliveras G; Hawkins HK; Herndon DN
    Dermatol Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 15720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.
    Roques C; Teot L
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18048870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective randomized clinical trial to investigate the effect of silicone gel sheeting (Cica-Care) on post-traumatic hypertrophic scar among the Chinese population.
    Li-Tsang CW; Lau JC; Choi J; Chan CC; Jianan L
    Burns; 2006 Sep; 32(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 16837136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a new visual analogue scale for the assessment of area scars.
    Micomonaco DC; Fung K; Mount G; Franklin J; Yoo J; Brandt M; Moore CC; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Feb; 38(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 19344616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pilot randomized control trial of scar repigmentation with UV light and dry tattooing.
    Brandt MG; Moore CC; Conlin AE; Stein JD; Doyle PC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 139(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 19041501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to assess scar hypertrophy--a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: a new objective method.
    Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Bochko V; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO
    Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 21518084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of a unique topical scar product vs white petrolatum following shave biopsies.
    Kircik LH
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2013 Jan; 12(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 23377333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Stissi V; Franchignoni F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(25):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19888834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Median sternotomy scar assessment.
    Jina H; Simcock J
    N Z Med J; 2011 Nov; 124(1346):57-62. PubMed ID: 22143853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives.
    Truong PT; Abnousi F; Yong CM; Hayashi A; Runkel JA; Phillips T; Olivotto IA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 16217470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpretation of the DermaLab Combo® pigmentation and vascularity measurements in burn scar assessment: an exploratory analysis.
    Gankande TU; Duke JM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
    Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1176-85. PubMed ID: 25703660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An objective device for measuring surface roughness of skin and scars.
    Bloemen MC; van Gerven MS; van der Wal MB; Verhaegen PD; Middelkoop E
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):706-15. PubMed ID: 21216493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.