These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19266588)

  • 1. A prospective randomized evaluation of scar assessment measures.
    Brandt MG; Moore CC; Micomonaco D; Fung K; Franklin JH; Yoo J; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 19266588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of hypernasality.
    Whitehill TL; Lee AS; Chun JC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 14748640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Colour evaluation in scars: tristimulus colorimeter, narrow-band simple reflectance meter or subjective evaluation?
    Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Kreis RW; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PP
    Burns; 2004 Mar; 30(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15019115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative and qualitative dermal change with microfat grafting of facial scars.
    Sardesai MG; Moore CC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Dec; 137(6):868-72. PubMed ID: 18036412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for evaluation of facial scars treated with self-drying silicone gel.
    Bianchi FA; Roccia F; Fiorini P; Berrone S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 20485035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
    Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
    Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
    van de Kar AL; Corion LU; Smeulders MJ; Draaijers LJ; van der Horst CM; van Zuijlen PP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Aug; 116(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 16079683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview.
    Idriss N; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19152571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective assessment of burn scar vascularity, erythema, pliability, thickness, and planimetry.
    Oliveira GV; Chinkes D; Mitchell C; Oliveras G; Hawkins HK; Herndon DN
    Dermatol Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 15720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.
    Roques C; Teot L
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18048870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective randomized clinical trial to investigate the effect of silicone gel sheeting (Cica-Care) on post-traumatic hypertrophic scar among the Chinese population.
    Li-Tsang CW; Lau JC; Choi J; Chan CC; Jianan L
    Burns; 2006 Sep; 32(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 16837136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a new visual analogue scale for the assessment of area scars.
    Micomonaco DC; Fung K; Mount G; Franklin J; Yoo J; Brandt M; Moore CC; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Feb; 38(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 19344616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pilot randomized control trial of scar repigmentation with UV light and dry tattooing.
    Brandt MG; Moore CC; Conlin AE; Stein JD; Doyle PC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 139(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 19041501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to assess scar hypertrophy--a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: a new objective method.
    Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Bochko V; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO
    Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 21518084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of a unique topical scar product vs white petrolatum following shave biopsies.
    Kircik LH
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2013 Jan; 12(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 23377333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Stissi V; Franchignoni F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(25):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19888834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Median sternotomy scar assessment.
    Jina H; Simcock J
    N Z Med J; 2011 Nov; 124(1346):57-62. PubMed ID: 22143853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives.
    Truong PT; Abnousi F; Yong CM; Hayashi A; Runkel JA; Phillips T; Olivotto IA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 16217470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpretation of the DermaLab Combo® pigmentation and vascularity measurements in burn scar assessment: an exploratory analysis.
    Gankande TU; Duke JM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
    Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1176-85. PubMed ID: 25703660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An objective device for measuring surface roughness of skin and scars.
    Bloemen MC; van Gerven MS; van der Wal MB; Verhaegen PD; Middelkoop E
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):706-15. PubMed ID: 21216493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.