These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19266818)

  • 21. [Screening program for selection of hearing loss in newborn infants instituted by the European Community].
    Arnold B; Schorn K; Stecker M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar; 74(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 7755855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory brain-stem response in neonatal hearing screening, a comparative study].
    Xu ZM; Li J; Hu TZ; Sun JH; Shen XM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 83(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12812641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Newborn hearing screening in the NICU: profile of failed auditory brainstem response/passed otoacoustic emission.
    Berg AL; Spitzer JB; Towers HM; Bartosiewicz C; Diamond BE
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 16199704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony as a cause of failed neonatal hearing screening.
    Maris M; Venstermans C; Boudewyns AN
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jul; 75(7):973-5. PubMed ID: 21596446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Infant hearing screening: effects of timeline.
    Tsui PW; McPherson B; Wong EC; Ng IH
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 18429859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high-risk neonates].
    Xu FL; Xing QJ; Cheng XY
    Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 10(4):460-3. PubMed ID: 18706161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening.
    Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
    Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A preliminary study of a hearing screening model for newborn].
    Liu Z; Bu X; Xing G; Lu L
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):292-4. PubMed ID: 12762000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of auditory function using brainstem auditory evoked potentials and auditory steady state responses in infants with perinatal brain injury.
    Moreno-Aguirre AJ; Santiago-Rodríguez E; Harmony T; Fernández-Bouzas A; Porras-Kattz E
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Feb; 49(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 20151885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audiologic evaluation of neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses.
    Rhee CK; Park HM; Jang YJ
    Laryngoscope; 1999 Dec; 109(12):2005-8. PubMed ID: 10591364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening programs: protocol for developing countries.
    Bansal S; Gupta A; Nagarkar A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):1059-63. PubMed ID: 18479757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Follow-up default in a hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening programme in a low-income country.
    Olusanya BO
    Child Care Health Dev; 2009 Mar; 35(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 19228154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Benefit and pitfalls of newborn hearing screening.
    Asma A; Wan Fazlina WH; Almyzan A; Han YS; Jamilah AG; Roslin S; Ann MT; Borhan L; Wan Norliana A; Saim L; Rohana J
    Med J Malaysia; 2008 Oct; 63(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 19385487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Screening methods: current status.
    Hayes D
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2003; 9(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 12784223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Correlation of hearing screening with developmental outcomes in infants over a 2-year period.
    Chiong C; Ostrea E; Reyes A; Llanes EG; Uy ME; Chan A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 17453458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening for hearing loss and middle-ear effusion in school-age children, using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: a feasibility study.
    Georgalas C; Xenellis J; Davilis D; Tzangaroulakis A; Ferekidis E
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Dec; 122(12):1299-304. PubMed ID: 18423079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [A combined neonatal hearing screening protocol].
    Almenar Latorre A; Tapia Toca MC; Fernández Pérez C; Moro Serrano M
    An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Jul; 57(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 12139894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing screening program.
    Kirkim G; Serbetcioglu B; Erdag TK; Ceryan K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1461-9. PubMed ID: 18674822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Universal neonatal hearing screening: the Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns.
    De Capua B; Costantini D; Martufi C; Latini G; Gentile M; De Felice C
    Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):601-6. PubMed ID: 17307313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.