These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19267907)
1. Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude: a composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot. McPoil TG; Vicenzino B; Cornwall MW; Collins N; Warren M J Foot Ankle Res; 2009 Mar; 2():6. PubMed ID: 19267907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Arch height change during sit-to-stand: an alternative for the navicular drop test. McPoil TG; Cornwall MW; Medoff L; Vicenzino B; Forsberg K; Hilz D J Foot Ankle Res; 2008 Jul; 1(1):3. PubMed ID: 18822154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity. Williams DS; McClay IS Phys Ther; 2000 Sep; 80(9):864-71. PubMed ID: 10960934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of foot orthoses on foot mobility magnitude and arch height index in adults with flexible flat feet. Sheykhi-Dolagh R; Saeedi H; Farahmand B; Kamyab M; Kamali M; Gholizadeh H; Derayatifar AA; Curran S Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):190-6. PubMed ID: 24604086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and correlation of weight-bearing cone beam CT and Foot Posture Index (FPI) for measurements of foot posture: a test-retest study. Hansen P; Brinch S; Radev DI; Nybing JU; Toftgaard S; Johannsen FE Skeletal Radiol; 2023 Dec; 52(12):2387-2397. PubMed ID: 37130960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A minimal markerset for three-dimensional foot function assessment: measuring navicular drop and drift under dynamic conditions. Eichelberger P; Blasimann A; Lutz N; Krause F; Baur H J Foot Ankle Res; 2018; 11():15. PubMed ID: 29713385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the five image-based criteria of the foot posture index-6. Terada M; Wittwer AM; Gribble PA Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Apr; 9(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 24790780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Method-Comparison Study Highlighting the Disparity between Osseous- and Skin-Based Measures of Foot Mobility. Wearing SC; Jones B; Horstmann T; Robertson A Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2024 Apr; 56(4):737-744. PubMed ID: 37908026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of ultrasound imaging to measure midfoot plantar fat pad thickness in children. Riddiford-Harland DL; Steele JR; Baur LA J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2007 Oct; 37(10):644-7. PubMed ID: 17970412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of capturing foot parameters using digital scanning and the neutral suspension casting technique. Carroll M; Annabell ME; Rome K J Foot Ankle Res; 2011 Mar; 4(1):9. PubMed ID: 21375757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrinsic foot muscle size can be measured reliably in weight bearing using ultrasound imaging. Franettovich Smith MM; Hides JA; Hodges PW; Collins NJ Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():369-374. PubMed ID: 30583193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interrelationship between three-dimensional foot mobility and bodyweight bearing. Sato T; Fukui T; Kawata S; Nagahori K; Miyaso H; Li Z; Omotehara T; Itoh M J Phys Ther Sci; 2023 Mar; 35(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 36866006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking. Jonely H; Brismée JM; Sizer PS; James CR Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Oct; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21632159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio. McPoil TG; Cornwall MW; Vicenzino B; Teyhen DS; Molloy JM; Christie DS; Collins N Foot (Edinb); 2008 Dec; 18(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 20307441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Foot arch characterization: a review, a new metric, and a comparison. Xiong S; Goonetilleke RS; Witana CP; Weerasinghe TW; Au EY J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2010; 100(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 20093541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks. Queen RM; Mall NA; Nunley JA; Chuckpaiwong B Gait Posture; 2009 Jun; 29(4):582-6. PubMed ID: 19157878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The reliability of the modified reverse-6 taping procedure with elastic tape to alter the height and width of the medial longitudinal arch. Cornwall MW; Lebec M; Degeyter J; McPoil TG Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2013 Aug; 8(4):381-92. PubMed ID: 24175125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in leg spring behaviour, plantar loading and foot mobility magnitude induced by an exhaustive treadmill run in adolescent middle-distance runners. Fourchet F; Girard O; Kelly L; Horobeanu C; Millet GP J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Mar; 18(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 24589370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does foot placement affect the reliability of static foot posture measurements? McPoil TG; Carrell D; Ehlers D; Kuhlman H; Mufti J; Pomeroy M; Taylor O; Cornwall MW J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014; 104(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 24504575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The quarter-ellipsoid foot: A clinically applicable 3-dimensional composite measure of foot deformation during weight bearing. Fraser JJ; Hertel J Foot (Edinb); 2021 Mar; 46():101717. PubMed ID: 33509711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]