These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19268200)

  • 1. [Comparison vacuum extractor versus forceps].
    Schaal JP; Equy V; Hoffman P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Dec; 37 Suppl 8():S231-43. PubMed ID: 19268200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in instrumental deliveries with the Kobayashi vacuum extractor and low forceps.
    Meyer L; Mailloux J; Marcoux S; Blanchet P; Meyer F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1987; 66(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 3439447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery.
    Johanson RB; Rice C; Doyle M; Arthur J; Anyanwu L; Ibrahim J; Warwick A; Redman CW; O'Brien PM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jun; 100(6):524-30. PubMed ID: 8334086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps.
    Sainz JA; García-Mejido JA; Aquise A; Borrero C; Bonomi MJ; Fernández-Palacín A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):193.e1-193.e12. PubMed ID: 30391443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The vacuum extractor for obstetric delivery.
    Halme J; Ekbladh L
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Mar; 25(1):167-75. PubMed ID: 7067197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Neonatal outcomes after instrumental vaginal delivery].
    Baud O
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Dec; 37 Suppl 8():S260-8. PubMed ID: 19268202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Obstetrical vacuum-extractor and forceps. Indications and effects on the newborn infants].
    Bonfadini Bossi E; Rella R; Fagnani D; Salini P; Console V; Onofri MP; Pezzoli G
    Minerva Ginecol; 1980 Apr; 32(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 7383439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery.
    Johanson RB; Menon BK
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000224. PubMed ID: 10796182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [About the choice of extraction instrument for vaginal operative termination in vertex presentation (author's transl)].
    Altmann P; Georgiades E; Reinold E; Wagenbichler P
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1975 Dec; 35(12):949-55. PubMed ID: 1213260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.
    Dell DL; Sightler SE; Plauché WC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 4058820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A comparison of forceps and vacuum extraction delivery (author's transl)].
    Schaller A; Schramm M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Feb; 86(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 4439937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Silastic cup vacuum extractor or forceps: a comparative study.
    Svigos JM; Cave DG; Vigneswaran R; Resch A; Christiansen J
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Dec; 16(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 2099728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vacuum-assisted delivery.
    Vacca A
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Feb; 16(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 11866494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.