These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19268200)

  • 21. WITHDRAWN: Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery.
    Johanson R; Menon V
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Nov; 2010(11):CD000224. PubMed ID: 21069665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse.
    Johanson RB; Heycock E; Carter J; Sultan AH; Walklate K; Jones PW
    BJOG; 2014 Dec; 121 Suppl 7():23-8. PubMed ID: 25488084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is the vacuum extractor really the instrument of first choice?
    Chan CC; Malathi I; Yeo GS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 39(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 10554939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pattern of external birth trauma in southwestern Saudi Arabia.
    Benjamin B; Khan MR
    J Trauma; 1993 Nov; 35(5):737-41. PubMed ID: 8230339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity After Attempted Operative Vaginal Delivery.
    Froeliger A; Mattuizzi A; Madar H; Hamel JF; Bouchghoul H; Sentilhes L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 139(5):833-845. PubMed ID: 35576342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery.
    O'Mahony F; Hofmeyr GJ; Menon V
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Nov; (11):CD005455. PubMed ID: 21069686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Caughey AB; Sandberg PL; Zlatnik MG; Thiet MP; Parer JT; Laros RK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):908-12. PubMed ID: 16260505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Randomised clinical trial to assess anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery.
    Fitzpatrick M; Behan M; O'Connell PR; O'Herlihy C
    BJOG; 2003 Apr; 110(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 12699806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Obstetric vacuum extraction: state of the art in the new millennium.
    Miksovsky P; Watson WJ
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2001 Nov; 56(11):736-51. PubMed ID: 11711908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Failed forceps extraction: risk factors and maternal and neonatal morbidity].
    Langeron A; Mercier G; Chauleur C; Varlet MN; Patural H; Lima S; Seffert P; Chêne G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 22227232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neonatal and maternal complications among pregnant women delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps extraction.
    Kovavisarach E; Varanuntakul T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Apr; 82(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 10410490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications.
    Al-Kadri H; Sabr Y; Al-Saif S; Abulaimoun B; Ba'Aqeel H; Saleh A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Jul; 82(7):642-8. PubMed ID: 12790846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Forceps delivery for non-rotational and rotational operative vaginal delivery.
    Black M; Murphy DJ
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Apr; 56():55-68. PubMed ID: 30827815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcome of forceps delivery versus vacuum extraction--a review of 200 cases.
    Achanna S; Monga D
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Dec; 35(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 7761886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Kanarek KS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Risk of new-onset urinary incontinence after forceps and vacuum delivery in primiparous women.
    Arya LA; Jackson ND; Myers DL; Verma A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 185(6):1318-23; discussion 1323-4. PubMed ID: 11744903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Expulsion assistance in psychophysical childbirth by episiotomy, vacuum extractor or forceps under local anesthesia (apropos of 379 primipara cases)].
    NOTTER A
    Lyon Med; 1962 Nov; 94():827-63. PubMed ID: 13939057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Forceps and vacuum: one goal, two entities.
    de Leeuw JW; Daly JO
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Sep; 32(9):2349-2352. PubMed ID: 34076719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.