BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19268343)

  • 1. Lymph node counts in uterine cancer: a randomized double blind trial.
    Santoso JT; Azadi A; Wan J; Handorf C; Coleman RL; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 19268343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Separate submission of standard lymphadenectomy in 6 packets versus en bloc lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer.
    Ather MH; Alam Z; Jamshaid A; Siddiqui KM; Sulaiman MN
    Urol J; 2008; 5(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 18592461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left-right asymmetry in pelvic lymph nodes distribution: is there a right-side prevalence?
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Giudici S; Franchi M; Bolis P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):236-9. PubMed ID: 16343732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical implication of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with vulvar cancer and positive groin nodes.
    Klemm P; Marnitz S; Köhler C; Braig U; Schneider A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Oct; 99(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 15982723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymmetries in pelvic lymph nodes and their metastatic involvement by gynecologic cancer cells.
    Borekci B; Dane S; Gundogdu C; Kadanali S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Dec; 33(6):829-33. PubMed ID: 18001450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pelvic and aortic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Pereira A; Magrina JF; Rey V; Cortes M; Magtibay PM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):604-8. PubMed ID: 17321572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer.
    Jha MK; Corbett WA; Wilson RG; Koreli A; Papagrigoriadis S
    Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 17159746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevalence of and factors contributing to missing lymph tissue in uterine cancer staging surgery.
    Santoso JT; Kim K; Kumar S; Wan JY
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 130(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 23632206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lymph node detection by MRI before and after a systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Klerkx WM; Heintz AP; Mali WP; de Kort GA; Takahara T; van Dorst EB; Peeters PH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):315-8. PubMed ID: 19481787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Right-sided lateralisation of ovarian cancer and right bias asymmetry for involved pelvic lymph nodes by ovarian cancer cells.
    Dane S; Borekci B; Kadanali S
    Laterality; 2008 Sep; 13(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 18608852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lymph node harvest in colon cancer specimens depends on tumour factors, patients and doctors, but foremost on specimen handling.
    Storli K; Lindboe CF; Kristoffersen C; Kleiven K; Søndenaa K
    APMIS; 2011 Feb; 119(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 21208280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pelvic lymph node dissection via a lateral extraperitoneal approach: description of a technique.
    Querleu D; Ferron G; Rafii A; Bouissou E; Delannes M; Mery E; Gladieff L
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 18258287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymmetries in breast cancer lateralization and both axillary lymph node number and metastatic involvement.
    Dane S; Yildirim S; Koc M; Aktan M; Gundogdu C
    Lymphology; 2008 Jun; 41(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 18720914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The incidence of isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes.
    Abu-Rustum NR; Gomez JD; Alektiar KM; Soslow RA; Hensley ML; Leitao MM; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Barakat RR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Nov; 115(2):236-8. PubMed ID: 19666190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sentinel lymph node biopsy vs. pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: is it time to change the gold standard?
    Gortzak-Uzan L; Jimenez W; Nofech-Mozes S; Ismiil N; Khalifa MA; Dubé V; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; Covens A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Jan; 116(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 19875161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Lymphadenectomy for uterine cancer].
    Gouy S; Uzan C; Zafrani Y; Lhommé C; Pautier P; Duvillard P; Haie-Meder C; Morice P
    J Chir (Paris); 2008 Dec; 145 Spec no. 4():12S51-12S55. PubMed ID: 19194359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer.
    Polterauer S; Hefler LA; Petry M; Seebacher V; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
    Anticancer Res; 2008; 28(3B):1849-51. PubMed ID: 18630470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lymph node preparation in resected colorectal carcinoma specimens employing the acetone clearing method.
    Vogel C; Kirtil T; Oellig F; Stolte M
    Pathol Res Pract; 2008; 204(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 18023994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. To count and how to count, that is the question: interobserver and intraobserver variability among pathologists in lymph node counting.
    Parkash V; Bifulco C; Feinn R; Concato J; Jain D
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jul; 134(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 20551265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quality process study of lymph node evaluation in endometrial cancer.
    Forde GK; Carlson JW; Downey GO; Doss BJ; Shoemaker A; Harrison CR
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2011 Jul; 30(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 21623200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.