These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19268825)

  • 1. Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review.
    Chen Y; Kyung HM; Zhao WT; Yu WJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 19268825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant vs screw loading protocols in orthodontics.
    Ohashi E; Pecho OE; Moron M; Lagravere MO
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):721-7. PubMed ID: 16808583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determinants for success rates of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a meta-analysis (n > 50).
    Dalessandri D; Salgarello S; Dalessandri M; Lazzaroni E; Piancino M; Paganelli C; Maiorana C; Santoro F
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 23873818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of surface roughening on the success of orthodontic mini-implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van den Braak MCT; Hoekstra JWM; Bronkhorst EM; Schols JGJH; Ongkosuwito EM; Meijer GJ; van den Beucken JJJP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Mar; 165(3):262-271.e3. PubMed ID: 38069923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in orthodontics: review of the factors that influence the clinical success rate of the mini-implants.
    Leo M; Cerroni L; Pasquantonio G; Condò SG; Condò R
    Clin Ter; 2016; 167(3):e70-7. PubMed ID: 27424513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Insertion torque and success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review.
    Meursinge Reynders RA; Ronchi L; Ladu L; van Etten-Jamaludin F; Bipat S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Nov; 142(5):596-614.e5. PubMed ID: 23116501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mini-implants for direct or indirect orthodontic anchorage.
    Ren Y
    Evid Based Dent; 2009; 10(4):113. PubMed ID: 20023620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
    Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants in anchorage reinforcement during en-masse retraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Antoszewska-Smith J; Sarul M; Łyczek J; Konopka T; Kawala B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):440-455. PubMed ID: 28257728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Success of palatal implants or mini-screws placed median or paramedian for the reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic treatment: a systematic review.
    Kakali L; Alharbi M; Pandis N; Gkantidis N; Kloukos D
    Eur J Orthod; 2019 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 29608666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are orthodontic distalizers reinforced with the temporary skeletal anchorage devices effective?
    Fudalej P; Antoszewska J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):722-9. PubMed ID: 21640877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How do geometry-related parameters influence the clinical performance of orthodontic mini-implants? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cunha AC; da Veiga AMA; Masterson D; Mattos CT; Nojima LI; Nojima MCG; Maia LC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 46(12):1539-1551. PubMed ID: 28687173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the stability of self-drilling mini-implants for maxillary anchorage under immediate loading.
    Lifshitz AB; Muñoz M
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 21491001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review.
    Schätzle M; Männchen R; Zwahlen M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1351-9. PubMed ID: 19793320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics--a review of various systems in animal and human studies.
    Janssen KI; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A; Sandham A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 18416415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical observations and success rates of palatal implants.
    Asscherickx K; Vannet BV; Bottenberg P; Wehrbein H; Sabzevar MM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 20122439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mini-implants in orthodontics: a systematic review of the literature.
    Reynders R; Ronchi L; Bipat S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):564.e1-19; discussion 564-5. PubMed ID: 19409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implants for orthodontic anchorage. Meta-analysis.
    Labanauskaite B; Jankauskas G; Vasiliauskas A; Haffar N
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(4):128-32. PubMed ID: 16501316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of stability of orthodontic mini-implants under orthodontic loading: A computed tomography study.
    Garg KK; Gupta M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 26275187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.