These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19268840)

  • 21. Effect of image compression of digital lateral cephalograms on the reproducibility of cephalometric points.
    Duarte H; Vieck R; Siqueira DF; Angelieri F; Bommarito S; Dalben G; Sannomiya EK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):393-400. PubMed ID: 19700533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automatic localization of cephalometric Landmarks.
    Grau V; Alcañiz M; Juan MC; Monserrat C; Knoll C
    J Biomed Inform; 2001 Jun; 34(3):146-56. PubMed ID: 11723697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cephalometric analysis performance discrepancy between orthodontists and an artificial intelligence model using lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Guinot-Barona C; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Galán López L; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):555-565. PubMed ID: 37882509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of JPEG2000 compression on landmark identification of lateral cephalometric digital radiographs.
    Abdelkarim A; Nummikoski P; Gakunga P; Hatch JP; Dove SB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):518-524. PubMed ID: 20889059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An evaluation of the J.O.E. cephalometric software.
    Dreyer CW
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Oct; 13(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 8975658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced.
    Naoumova J; Lindman R
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19342425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing subjectivity in the evaluation of pre-clinical dental preparations for fixed prosthodontics using the Kavo PrepAssistant.
    Cardoso JA; Barbosa C; Fernandes S; Silva CL; Pinho A
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Aug; 10(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 16842589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of cephalometric measurements from three radiological clinics.
    Gonçalves FA; Schiavon L; Pereira Neto JS; Nouer DF
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 16878211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the reproducibility of manual tracing and on-screen digitization for cephalometric profile variables.
    Dvortsin DP; Sandham A; Pruim GJ; Dijkstra PU
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):586-91. PubMed ID: 18719051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigation of filter sets for supervised pixel classification of cephalometric landmarks by spatial spectroscopy.
    Rudolph DJ; Coggins JM; Moon H
    Int J Med Inform; 1997 Dec; 47(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 9513007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Repeated measures analysis of geometrically constructed and directly determined cephalometric points.
    Savage AW; Showfety KJ; Yancey J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Apr; 91(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 3471071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is there consistency in cephalometric landmark identification amongst oral and maxillofacial surgeons?
    Miloro M; Borba AM; Ribeiro-Junior O; Naclério-Homem MG; Jungner M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 43(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24055177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy.
    Roden-Johnson D; English J; Gallerano R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 18405820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study.
    Durão AP; Morosolli A; Pittayapat P; Bolstad N; Ferreira AP; Jacobs R
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2015 Dec; 45(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 26730368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cephalometric digitization: A determination of the minimum scanner settings necessary for precise landmark identification.
    Held CL; Ferguson DJ; Gallo MW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):472-81. PubMed ID: 11343018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Photo archiving, cephalometric analyses, and information sharing on the Internet.
    Abraham Z
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):98-100. PubMed ID: 17208113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Interactive online program to improve cephalometric tracing skills.
    Leonardi R; Giordano D; Caltabiano M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):256-8. PubMed ID: 15316484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.
    Kusnoto B
    Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 17692701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quality assessment of lateral cephalograms amongst radiologists and orthodontists.
    Ortendahl TW; Borrman H; Gröndahl HG
    Br J Orthod; 1994 Feb; 21(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 8199164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.