BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19268855)

  • 1. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis?
    Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Kullnig PE; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19268855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
    Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification of breast mass lesions using model-based analysis of the characteristic kinetic curve derived from fuzzy c-means clustering.
    Chang YC; Huang YH; Huang CS; Chang PK; Chen JH; Chang RF
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):312-22. PubMed ID: 22245697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
    Schnall MD; Blume J; Bluemke DA; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Thickman D; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Lehman C; Gatsonis CA
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16373758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance.
    Sardanelli F; Fausto A; Esseridou A; Di Leo G; Kirchin MA
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 18340247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can color-coded parametric maps improve dynamic enhancement pattern analysis in MR mammography?
    Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Beger S; Freiberg C; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19862654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images.
    Holli K; Lääperi AL; Harrison L; Luukkaala T; Toivonen T; Ryymin P; Dastidar P; Soimakallio S; Eskola H
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 19945302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.
    Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
    Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic MRI of solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of enhancement patterns of malignant and benign small peripheral lung lesions.
    Kono R; Fujimoto K; Terasaki H; Müller NL; Kato S; Sadohara J; Hayabuchi N; Takamori S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 17179342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
    Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angle between 1 and 4 min gives the most significant difference in time-intensity curves between benign disease and breast cancer: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in 103 patients with breast lesions.
    Hara M; Watanabe T; Okumura A; Kato K; Mohri N; Ishikawa M; Mizuno A; Takeyama H
    Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 19712811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Self-organizing neural networks for automatic detection and classification of contrast (media) enhancement of lesions in dynamic MR-mammography].
    Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Kauczor HU; Achenbach T; Rieker O; Schreiber WG; Heitmann KR; Beier T; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):703-13. PubMed ID: 15871086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
    Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
    Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
    Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast.
    Kurz KD; Steinhaus D; Klar V; Cohnen M; Wittsack HJ; Saleh A; Mödder U; Blondin D
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 18060715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease pilot study.
    Oto A; Fan X; Mustafi D; Jansen SA; Karczmar GS; Rubin DT; Kayhan A
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1223-30. PubMed ID: 19524458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.