These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19268855)
1. Application of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in MR-mammography (MRM): do we really need whole lesion time curve distribution analysis? Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Kullnig PE; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19268855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach. Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classification of breast mass lesions using model-based analysis of the characteristic kinetic curve derived from fuzzy c-means clustering. Chang YC; Huang YH; Huang CS; Chang PK; Chen JH; Chang RF Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):312-22. PubMed ID: 22245697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Schnall MD; Blume J; Bluemke DA; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Thickman D; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Lehman C; Gatsonis CA Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16373758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound. Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gadobenate dimeglumine as a contrast agent for dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging: effect of higher initial enhancement thresholds on diagnostic performance. Sardanelli F; Fausto A; Esseridou A; Di Leo G; Kirchin MA Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 18340247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can color-coded parametric maps improve dynamic enhancement pattern analysis in MR mammography? Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Beger S; Freiberg C; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19862654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images. Holli K; Lääperi AL; Harrison L; Luukkaala T; Toivonen T; Ryymin P; Dastidar P; Soimakallio S; Eskola H Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 19945302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features. Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic MRI of solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of enhancement patterns of malignant and benign small peripheral lung lesions. Kono R; Fujimoto K; Terasaki H; Müller NL; Kato S; Sadohara J; Hayabuchi N; Takamori S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 17179342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results. Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Angle between 1 and 4 min gives the most significant difference in time-intensity curves between benign disease and breast cancer: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in 103 patients with breast lesions. Hara M; Watanabe T; Okumura A; Kato K; Mohri N; Ishikawa M; Mizuno A; Takeyama H Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 19712811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Self-organizing neural networks for automatic detection and classification of contrast (media) enhancement of lesions in dynamic MR-mammography]. Vomweg TW; Teifke A; Kauczor HU; Achenbach T; Rieker O; Schreiber WG; Heitmann KR; Beier T; Thelen M Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):703-13. PubMed ID: 15871086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors. Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions. Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast. Kurz KD; Steinhaus D; Klar V; Cohnen M; Wittsack HJ; Saleh A; Mödder U; Blondin D Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 18060715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease pilot study. Oto A; Fan X; Mustafi D; Jansen SA; Karczmar GS; Rubin DT; Kayhan A Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1223-30. PubMed ID: 19524458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]