BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19269081)

  • 1. Real-time contaminant detection and classification in a drinking water pipe using conventional water quality sensors: techniques and experimental results.
    Jeffrey Yang Y; Haught RC; Goodrich JA
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2494-506. PubMed ID: 19269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling and testing of reactive contaminant transport in drinking water pipes: chlorine response and implications for online contaminant detection.
    Jeffrey Yang Y; Goodrich JA; Clark RM; Li SY
    Water Res; 2008 Mar; 42(6-7):1397-412. PubMed ID: 17991507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection of a battery of rapid toxicity sensors for drinking water evaluation.
    van der Schalie WH; James RR; Gargan TP
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2006 Jul; 22(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 16406499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Persistence of pharmaceuticals and other organic compounds in chlorinated drinking water as a function of time.
    Gibs J; Stackelberg PE; Furlong ET; Meyer M; Zaugg SD; Lippincott RL
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Feb; 373(1):240-9. PubMed ID: 17188338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time detection and identification of aqueous chlorine transformation products using QTOF MS.
    Vanderford BJ; Mawhinney DB; Rosario-Ortiz FL; Snyder SA
    Anal Chem; 2008 Jun; 80(11):4193-9. PubMed ID: 18465880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contamination event detection using multiple types of conventional water quality sensors in source water.
    Liu S; Che H; Smith K; Chen L
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Aug; 16(8):2028-38. PubMed ID: 24953418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of cyanopigment determination as an indicator of cyanotoxins in drinking water.
    Schmidt W; Petzoldt H; Bornmann K; Imhof L; Moldaenke C
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(8):1531-40. PubMed ID: 19403966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fluorescence monitoring at a recycled water treatment plant and associated dual distribution system--implications for cross-connection detection.
    Hambly AC; Henderson RK; Storey MV; Baker A; Stuetz RM; Khan SJ
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5323-33. PubMed ID: 20655084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Well vulnerability: a quantitative approach for source water protection.
    Frind EO; Molson JW; Rudolph DL
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):732-42. PubMed ID: 16961495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continuous monitoring of residual chlorine concentrations in response to controlled microbial intrusions in a laboratory-scale distribution system.
    Helbling DE; Vanbriesen JM
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3162-72. PubMed ID: 18433828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling daily variation of trihalomethane compounds in drinking water system, Houston, Texas.
    Chaib E; Moschandreas D
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Mar; 151(2-3):662-8. PubMed ID: 17658688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of factors affecting the accumulation of vinyl chloride in polyvinyl chloride piping used in drinking water distribution systems.
    Walter RK; Lin PH; Edwards M; Richardson RE
    Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(8):2607-15. PubMed ID: 21420710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Network hydraulics inclusion in water quality event detection using multiple sensor stations data.
    Oliker N; Ostfeld A
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():47-58. PubMed ID: 25996752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Lead pollution of drinking water in lower Saxony from corrosion of pipe materials].
    Zietz BP; Lass J; Dunkelberg H; Suchenwirth R
    Gesundheitswesen; 2009 May; 71(5):265-74. PubMed ID: 19387929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-pipe water quality monitoring in water supply systems under steady and unsteady state flow conditions: a quantitative assessment.
    Aisopou A; Stoianov I; Graham NJ
    Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):235-46. PubMed ID: 22094001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards health impact assessment of drinking-water privatization--the example of waterborne carcinogens in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany).
    Fehr R; Mekel O; Lacombe M; Wolf U
    Bull World Health Organ; 2003; 81(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 12894324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrated hydraulic and organophosphate pesticide injection simulations for enhancing event detection in water distribution systems.
    Schwartz R; Lahav O; Ostfeld A
    Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():271-84. PubMed ID: 25016300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New methods to monitor emerging chemicals in the drinking water production chain.
    van Wezel A; Mons M; van Delft W
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 20082002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrated risk assessment and screening analysis of drinking water safety of a conventional water supply system.
    Sun F; Chen J; Tong Q; Zeng S
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):47-56. PubMed ID: 17898443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational modelling methods for assessing the risks from lead in drinking water.
    Hayes CR
    J Water Health; 2010 Sep; 8(3):532-42. PubMed ID: 20375482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.