350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19271848)
1. Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response times.
Klein Entink RH; Kuhn JT; Hornke LF; Fox JP
Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 19271848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.
Fox JP
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):145-72. PubMed ID: 15969844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Semi-parametric proportional hazards models with crossed random effects for psychometric response times.
Loeys T; Legrand C; Schettino A; Pourtois G
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):304-27. PubMed ID: 23937392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cognitive functions, their development and modern diagnostic methods].
Klasik A; Janas-Kozik M; Krupka-Matuszczyk I; Augustyniak E
Przegl Lek; 2006; 63 Suppl 1():29-34. PubMed ID: 17471820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
Sinharay S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of cognitive performance in computer programming concept acquisition: interactive effects of visual metaphors and the cognitive style construct.
McKay E
J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(3):257-91. PubMed ID: 12029171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
Raykov T; Penev S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure for dimensionality assessment in multidimensional item response theory.
Levy R; Svetina D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):208-32. PubMed ID: 21492129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence analysis for the factor analysis model with ranking data.
Xu L; Poon WY; Lee SY
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):133-61. PubMed ID: 18482479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting subscores for institutions.
Haberman S; Sinharay S; Puhan G
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):79-95. PubMed ID: 17937841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An accumulator model for responses and response times in tests based on the proportional hazards model.
Ranger J; Kuhn JT
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):388-407. PubMed ID: 23992122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian analysis of interleaved learning and response bias in behavioral experiments.
Smith AC; Wirth S; Suzuki WA; Brown EN
J Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 97(3):2516-24. PubMed ID: 17182907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Latent variable models for partially ordered responses and trajectory analysis of anger-related feelings.
Meulders M; Ip EH; De Boeck P
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):117-43. PubMed ID: 15969843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The acquisition of robust and flexible cognitive skills.
Taatgen NA; Huss D; Dickison D; Anderson JR
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):548-65. PubMed ID: 18729715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.
Cheng Y; Chang HH
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):369-83. PubMed ID: 18534047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian model assessment and comparison using cross-validation predictive densities.
Vehtari A; Lampinen J
Neural Comput; 2002 Oct; 14(10):2439-68. PubMed ID: 12396570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning.
Tenenbaum JB; Griffiths TL; Kemp C
Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jul; 10(7):309-18. PubMed ID: 16797219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action.
Howes A; Lewis RL; Vera A
Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):717-51. PubMed ID: 19839682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resolving mixtures of strategies in spatial visualization tasks.
Mislevy RJ; Wingersky MS; Irvine SH; Dann PL
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 1991 Nov; 44 ( Pt 2)():265-88. PubMed ID: 1772801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
