These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19271886)

  • 1. Effect of target spatial frequency on accommodative response in myopes and emmetropes.
    Taylor J; Charman WN; O'Donnell C; Radhakrishnan H
    J Vis; 2009 Jan; 9(1):16.1-14. PubMed ID: 19271886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes.
    Abbott ML; Schmid KL; Strang NC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 Jan; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9666906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accommodation response to Chinese and Latin characters in Chinese-illiterate young adults.
    Radhakrishnan H; Hartwig A; Charman WN; Llorente L
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Nov; 98(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 26450168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of monocular and binocular viewing on the accommodation response to real targets in emmetropia and myopia.
    Seidel D; Gray LS; Heron G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 82(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 15829856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of spatial frequency on the accommodation responses of myopes and emmetropes under various detection demands.
    Xu J; Zheng Z; Drobe B; Jiang J; Chen H
    Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt A):1-7. PubMed ID: 26218290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of accommodative adaptation on static and dynamic accommodation in emmetropia and late-onset myopia.
    Jiang BC; White JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 May; 76(5):295-302. PubMed ID: 10375245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relationship between object spatial profile and accommodation microfluctuations in emmetropes and myopes.
    Day M; Gray LS; Seidel D; Strang NC
    J Vis; 2009 Sep; 9(10):5.1-13. PubMed ID: 19810786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic accommodation responses following adaptation to defocus.
    Cufflin MP; Mallen EA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Oct; 85(10):982-91. PubMed ID: 18832977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of common reductions in letter size and contrast on accommodation responses in young adult myopes and emmetropes.
    Schmid KL; Hilmer KS; Lawrence RA; Loh SY; Morrish LJ; Brown B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 82(7):602-11. PubMed ID: 16044072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus.
    Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 16390487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes: a summary and update.
    Schmid KL; Strang NC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Nov; 35(6):613-21. PubMed ID: 26497293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variability of the accommodation response in early onset myopia.
    Langaas T; Riddell PM; Svarverud E; Ystenaes AE; Langeggen I; Bruenech JR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 18174839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accommodative stimulus response curve of emmetropes and myopes.
    Yeo AC; Kang KK; Tang W
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Dec; 35(12):868-74. PubMed ID: 17218998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Static accommodative responses following adaptation to differential levels of blur.
    Cufflin MP; Hazel CA; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jul; 27(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 17584286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accommodative stimulus-response curves to low-pass filtered natural images.
    Esteve-Taboada JJ; Bernal-Molina P; Montés-Micó R; Ferrer-Blasco T
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 256(9):1731-1737. PubMed ID: 29666916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transient Axial Length Change during the Accommodation Response in Young Adults.
    Mallen EA; Kashyap P; Hampson KM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1251-4. PubMed ID: 16505066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes.
    Radhakrishnan H; Allen PM; Charman WN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 48(9):4375-82. PubMed ID: 17724230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased accommodation following adaptation to image blur in myopes.
    Vera-Diaz FA; Gwiazda J; Thorn F; Held R
    J Vis; 2004 Dec; 4(12):1111-9. PubMed ID: 15669915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accommodation, pupil diameter and myopia.
    Charman WN; Radhakrishnan H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jan; 29(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 19154283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accommodative response to peripheral stimuli in myopes and emmetropes.
    Hartwig A; Charman WN; Radhakrishnan H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jan; 31(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 21054470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.