These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19271902)
1. The influence of clutter on real-world scene search: evidence from search efficiency and eye movements. Henderson JM; Chanceaux M; Smith TJ J Vis; 2009 Jan; 9(1):32.1-8. PubMed ID: 19271902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: global and local clutter. Beck MR; Lohrenz MC; Trafton JG J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Sep; 16(3):238-50. PubMed ID: 20853984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regional effects of clutter on human target detection performance. Asher MF; Tolhurst DJ; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23620535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cutting through the clutter: searching for targets in evolving complex scenes. Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ J Vis; 2011 Dec; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 22159628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Asymmetries in the direction of saccades during perception of scenes and fractals: effects of image type and image features. Foulsham T; Kingstone A Vision Res; 2010 Apr; 50(8):779-95. PubMed ID: 20144645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes. Underwood G; Templeman E; Lamming L; Foulsham T Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 17222564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential detection of global luminance and contrast changes across saccades and flickers during active scene perception. Henderson JM; Brockmole JR; Gajewski DA Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 18078976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New insights into feature and conjunction search: I. Evidence from pupil size, eye movements and ageing. Porter G; Tales A; Troscianko T; Wilcock G; Haworth J; Leonards U Cortex; 2010 May; 46(5):621-36. PubMed ID: 19591979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search. Malcolm GL; Henderson JM J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):4.1-11. PubMed ID: 20462305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in the functional visual field during search with and without eye movements. Motter BC; Simoni DA Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2382-93. PubMed ID: 18722398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect. Graupner ST; Pannasch S; Velichkovsky BM Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 21291920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the human ongoing visual search performance by eye tracking application and sequencing tests. Veneri G; Pretegiani E; Rosini F; Federighi P; Federico A; Rufa A Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Sep; 107(3):468-77. PubMed ID: 21453982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Võ ML; Henderson JM J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A crowding model of visual clutter. van den Berg R; Cornelissen FW; Roerdink JB J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):24.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. Malcolm GL; Henderson JM J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):8.1-13. PubMed ID: 20053071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scrambled eyes? Disrupting scene structure impedes focal processing and increases bottom-up guidance. Foulsham T; Alan R; Kingstone A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2008-25. PubMed ID: 21647804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]