316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19272807)
1. Utility of color Doppler ultrasound in evaluating the status of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer.
Dangore-Khasbage S; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR; Banode PJ; Bhake A; Choudhary MS; Lohe VK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 19272807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the efficacy of colour Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Dangore SB; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 18460573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of color doppler ultrasonography in evaluation of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer patients.
Jayachandran S; Sachdeva SK
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):557-8. PubMed ID: 23257501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymphadenopathy: differentiation of benign from malignant disease--color Doppler US assessment of intranodal angioarchitecture.
Tschammler A; Ott G; Schang T; Seelbach-Goebel B; Schwager K; Hahn D
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 9646801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging.
Gupta A; Rahman K; Shahid M; Kumar A; Qaseem SM; Hassan SA; Siddiqui FA
Head Neck; 2011 Mar; 33(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20652889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Ultrasound evaluation of characteristics of cervical lymph nodes with special reference to color Doppler ultrasound. A contribution to differentiating reactive from metastatic lymph node involvement in the neck].
Issing PR; Kettling T; Kempf HG; Heermann R; Lenarz T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Oct; 78(10):566-72. PubMed ID: 10595342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy with intranodal color Doppler flow signals in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Sato N; Kawabe R; Fujita K; Omura S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 9798237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic efficacy of color Doppler ultrasound in evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Misra D; Panjwani S; Rai S; Misra A; Prabhat M; Gupta P; Talukder SK
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2016; 13(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 27274341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes.
Ahuja AT; Ying M; Ho SS; Metreweli C
Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 11247696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential diagnosis of lymph node lesions: a semiquantitative approach with colour Doppler ultrasound.
Steinkamp HJ; Mueffelmann M; Böck JC; Thiel T; Kenzel P; Felix R
Br J Radiol; 1998 Aug; 71(848):828-33. PubMed ID: 9828794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonographic and histopathological features of cervical lymph node metastases.
Genes I; Mogoantă CA; Lostun G; Lostun A; Mózes H; Műhlfay G
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2014; 55(2):369-75. PubMed ID: 24969988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Differential diagnosis in cervical lymphadenopathies: efficacy of B-mode, color and power Doppler ultrasonography].
Ayata Z; Apaydin M; Varer M; Sarsilmaz A; Calli C; Rezanko T
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2009; 19(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 19860630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vascular pathology of malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with power Doppler ultrasound.
Wu CH; Hsu MM; Chang YL; Hsieh FJ
Cancer; 1998 Sep; 83(6):1189-96. PubMed ID: 9740085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis.
Choi MY; Lee JW; Jang KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):981-4. PubMed ID: 7677005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes with color Doppler sonography.
Chang DB; Yuan A; Yu CJ; Luh KT; Kuo SH; Yang PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8141027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography.
Na DG; Lim HK; Byun HS; Kim HD; Ko YH; Baek JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9129432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Nodes: A Comparative Study With B-mode and Color Doppler Sonography.
Acu L; Oktar SÖ; Acu R; Yücel C; Cebeci S
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2491-2499. PubMed ID: 27794132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Differentiation of abdominal lymphadenoptahy with power Doppler sonography].
Neumann-Silkow H; Görg C
Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 20084598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes: value of B-mode and color Doppler sonography.
Adibelli ZH; Unal G; Gül E; Uslu F; Koçak U; Abali Y
Eur J Radiol; 1998 Oct; 28(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 9881258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computer-Aided Assessment of Intranodal Vascularity in Distinguishing Different Causes of Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
Ying M; Cheng SC; Ahuja AT
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):2010-6. PubMed ID: 27131839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
