These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19272812)

  • 21. Image quality in digital radiographic systems.
    de Almeida SM; de Oliveira AE; Ferreira RI; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 12964659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating phantom image quality parameters to optimise patient radiation dose in dental digital radiology.
    Gonzalez L; Vano E; Fernandez R; Ziraldo V; Delgado J; Delgado V; Moro J; Ubeda C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22232776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors.
    Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Gotfredsen E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Mar; 103(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 17321456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detecting computer-enhanced dentistry.
    Neiburger EJ; Frandzel YL
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2008; 57(2):30-2. PubMed ID: 18705212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions.
    Wallace JA; Nair MK; Colaco MF; Kapa SF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 11458252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms.
    Alpöz E; Soğur E; Baksi Akdeniz BG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):490-4. PubMed ID: 18033946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of ambient light and bit depth of digital radiograph on observer performance in determination of endodontic file positioning.
    Heo MS; Han DH; An BM; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 17604662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital radiography: improving image quality.
    Kutsch VK
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 18(5):289-90. PubMed ID: 16903533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimum exposure ranges for computed dental radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kuroyanagi K; Rumack PM; Schick DB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9446976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of two intraoral CCD sensor systems in terms of image quality and interobserver agreement.
    Schulze D; Rother UJ; Fuhrmann AW; Tietke M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Apr; 6(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 14552151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Energy dependence of photostimulable phosphor.
    Chu RY; Christian EN; Eaton BG
    Radiol Technol; 2002; 73(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 11928163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The digital revolution, images and X-rays.
    Emmott LF
    N Y State Dent J; 2005 Jan; 71(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15768910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determination of the optimal conditions for dental subtraction radiography using a storage phosphor system.
    Brettle DS; Ellwood R; Davies R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10202471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiopacity evaluation of new root canal filling materials by digitalization of images.
    Tanomaru-Filho M; Jorge EG; Guerreiro Tanomaru JM; Gonçalves M
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):249-51. PubMed ID: 17320706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Chang HF; Chen KC
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11036999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position.
    Hubar JS; Carr RF
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Mar; 44(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 10097371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relationship between image information content and observer performance in digital intraoral radiography.
    Takarabe S; Okamura K; Kuramoto T; Tokumori K; Kato T; Yoshiura K
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Jul; 39(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 36289169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.