BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19272885)

  • 1. A new method for electric impedance imaging using an eddy current with a tetrapolar circuit.
    Ahsan-Ul-Ambia ; Toda S; Takemae T; Kosugi Y; Hongo M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Feb; 56(2):400-6. PubMed ID: 19272885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrical impedance endo-tomography: imaging tissue from inside.
    Jossinet J; Marry E; Montalibet A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):560-5. PubMed ID: 12166851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images.
    Khang HS; Lee BI; Oh SH; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Cho MH; Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):695-702. PubMed ID: 12166867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A tetrapolar circuit method using magnetic field for biological resistivity measurement].
    Takemae T; Kosugi Y; Saito H; Ikebe J; Okubo S; Hongo M
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1989 Mar; 27(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 2754860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
    Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (mfEIT) system KHU Mark1: impedance spectroscopy and time-difference imaging.
    Oh TI; Koo H; Lee KH; Kim SM; Lee J; Kim SW; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Mar; 29(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 18367806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm.
    Kwon O; Woo EJ; Yoon JR; Seo JK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Feb; 49(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12066883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S13-27. PubMed ID: 17664631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [An experimental system of induced-current EIT].
    Dong X; You F; Qin M; Shi X; Liu R; Xiang H; Fu F; Cui W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jun; 21(3):416-9. PubMed ID: 15250146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A data acquisition system for induced current electrical impedance tomography].
    Xiang H; Dong X; Qin M; You F; Shi X; Fu F; Liu R; Ma J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 22(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 16156281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Propagation of measurement noise through backprojection reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography.
    Frangi AF; Riu PJ; Rosell J; Viergever MA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):566-78. PubMed ID: 12166852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
    Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconstruction of conductivity using the dual-loop method with one injection current in MREIT.
    Lee TH; Nam HS; Lee MG; Kim YJ; Woo EJ; Kwon OI
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7523-39. PubMed ID: 21098919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
    Woo EJ; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noninvasive imaging of bioimpedance distribution by means of current reconstruction magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
    Gao N; He B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 May; 55(5):1530-8. PubMed ID: 18440899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8468073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimum receiver array design for magnetic induction tomography.
    Gürsoy D; Scharfetter H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 May; 56(5):1435-41. PubMed ID: 19203883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
    Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On optimal current patterns for electrical impedance tomography.
    Demidenko E; Hartov A; Soni N; Paulsen KD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Feb; 52(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 15709661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconstructions of chest phantoms by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography.
    Isaacson D; Mueller JL; Newell JC; Siltanen S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):821-8. PubMed ID: 15250634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.