143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1927290)
21. Marginal seal of composite inlays using different polymerization techniques.
Liberman R; Ben-Amar A; Herteanu L; Judes H
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9049916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of sodium hypochlorite on microleakage of composite resin restorations using three adhesive systems.
Shinohara MS; Bedran-de-Castro AK; Amaral CM; Pimenta LA
J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 15293421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations.
Saunders WP; Grieve AR; Russell EM; Alani AH
J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Nov; 17(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 2126555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of dentin adhesives on contraction of restorative resins in cavities surrounded by acid-etched enamel.
Amarante de Araujo P; Asmussen E
Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Oct; 48(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 2123598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class I resin composite restorations.
Abdalla AI; Davidson CL
J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):87-90. PubMed ID: 8636499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
Owens BM; Johnson WW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations--long-term studies.
Grieve AR; Saunders WP; Alani AH
J Oral Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 20(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 8429419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microleakage of three generically different fluoride-releasing liner/bases.
Douglas WH; Fundingsland JW
J Dent; 1992 Dec; 20(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 1452878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of current-generation bonding systems on microleakage of resin composite restorations.
Yazici AR; Başeren M; Dayangaç B
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):763-9. PubMed ID: 12553620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Enamel and dentin bond strength and bonding mechanism to dentin of Gluma CPS to primary teeth.
Fritz U; García-Godoy F; Finger WJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 9096816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
