These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19272938)

  • 1. f-Information measures for efficient selection of discriminative genes from microarray data.
    Maji P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Apr; 56(4):1063-9. PubMed ID: 19272938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fuzzy-rough sets for information measures and selection of relevant genes from microarray data.
    Maji P; Pal SK
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2010 Jun; 40(3):741-52. PubMed ID: 19887323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Filter versus wrapper gene selection approaches in DNA microarray domains.
    Inza I; Larrañaga P; Blanco R; Cerrolaza AJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2004 Jun; 31(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 15219288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretable gene expression classifier with an accurate and compact fuzzy rule base for microarray data analysis.
    Ho SY; Hsieh CH; Chen HM; Huang HL
    Biosystems; 2006 Sep; 85(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 16490299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relevant and significant supervised gene clusters for microarray cancer classification.
    Maji P; Das C
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2012 Jun; 11(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22552589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiclass cancer classification by support vector machines with class-wise optimized genes and probability estimates.
    Anand A; Suganthan PN
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Aug; 259(3):533-40. PubMed ID: 19406131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of differential gene expression for microarray data using recursive random forest.
    Wu XY; Wu ZY; Li K
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(24):2492-6. PubMed ID: 19187584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection of relevant genes in cancer diagnosis based on their prediction accuracy.
    Maglietta R; D'Addabbo A; Piepoli A; Perri F; Liuni S; Pesole G; Ancona N
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 16920342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene selection and classification from microarray data using kernel machine.
    Cho JH; Lee D; Park JH; Lee IB
    FEBS Lett; 2004 Jul; 571(1-3):93-8. PubMed ID: 15280023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gene selection from microarray data for cancer classification--a machine learning approach.
    Wang Y; Tetko IV; Hall MA; Frank E; Facius A; Mayer KF; Mewes HW
    Comput Biol Chem; 2005 Feb; 29(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 15680584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multiple kernel support vector machine scheme for feature selection and rule extraction from gene expression data of cancer tissue.
    Chen Z; Li J; Wei L
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 Oct; 41(2):161-75. PubMed ID: 17851055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New variable selection method using interval segmentation purity with application to blockwise kernel transform support vector machine classification of high-dimensional microarray data.
    Tang LJ; Du W; Fu HY; Jiang JH; Wu HL; Shen GL; Yu RQ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Aug; 49(8):2002-9. PubMed ID: 19645418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tumor classification ranking from microarray data.
    Hewett R; Kijsanayothin P
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21. PubMed ID: 18831787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FM-test: a fuzzy-set-theory-based approach to differential gene expression data analysis.
    Liang LR; Lu S; Wang X; Lu Y; Mandal V; Patacsil D; Kumar D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S7. PubMed ID: 17217525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selecting a minimal number of relevant genes from microarray data to design accurate tissue classifiers.
    Huang HL; Lee CC; Ho SY
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 17291683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A robust hybrid between genetic algorithm and support vector machine for extracting an optimal feature gene subset.
    Li L; Jiang W; Li X; Moser KL; Guo Z; Du L; Wang Q; Topol EJ; Wang Q; Rao S
    Genomics; 2005 Jan; 85(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 15607418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selecting differentially expressed genes using minimum probability of classification error.
    Mahata P; Mahata K
    J Biomed Inform; 2007 Dec; 40(6):775-86. PubMed ID: 17950675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gene expression profiling of nonneoplastic mucosa may predict clinical outcome of colon cancer patients.
    Barrier A; Boelle PY; Lemoine A; Tse C; Brault D; Chiappini F; Lacaine F; Houry S; Huguier M; Flahault A; Dudoit S
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Dec; 48(12):2238-48. PubMed ID: 16228831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ameliorative missing value imputation for robust biological knowledge inference.
    Sehgal MS; Gondal I; Dooley LS; Coppel R
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Aug; 41(4):499-514. PubMed ID: 18334307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gene expression profile class prediction using linear Bayesian classifiers.
    Asyali MH
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Dec; 37(12):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17517385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.