428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19272943)
1. Real-time management of faulty electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
Hartinger AE; Guardo R; Adler A; Gagnon H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Feb; 56(2):369-77. PubMed ID: 19272943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic detection of detached and erroneous electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
Asfaw Y; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S175-83. PubMed ID: 15798230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.
Hua P; Woo EJ; Webster JG; Tompkins WJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8468073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fast detection and data compensation for electrodes disconnection in long-term monitoring of dynamic brain electrical impedance tomography.
Zhang G; Dai M; Yang L; Li W; Li H; Xu C; Shi X; Dong X; Fu F
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Jan; 16(1):7. PubMed ID: 28086909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimum design of electrode structure and parameters in electrical impedance tomography.
Yan W; Hong S; Chaoshi R
Physiol Meas; 2006 Mar; 27(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 16462015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
Woo EJ; Seo JK
Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography.
de Munck JC; Faes TJ; Heethaar RM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 10833854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A data acquisition system for induced current electrical impedance tomography].
Xiang H; Dong X; Qin M; You F; Shi X; Fu F; Liu R; Ma J
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 22(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 16156281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.
Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S13-27. PubMed ID: 17664631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A high frequency electrical impedance tomograph using distributed parallel input channels.
Jossinet J; Trillaud C; Risacher F; McAdams ET
Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 8052171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconstruction of conductivity changes and electrode movements based on EIT temporal sequences.
Dai T; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2008 Jun; 29(6):S77-88. PubMed ID: 18544802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Propagation of measurement noise through backprojection reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography.
Frangi AF; Riu PJ; Rosell J; Viergever MA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):566-78. PubMed ID: 12166852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method for modelling and optimizing an electrical impedance tomography system.
Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S51-64. PubMed ID: 16636420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of techniques to optimize measurement of voltage changes in electrical impedance tomography by minimizing phase shift errors.
Fitzgerald AJ; Holder DS; Eadie L; Hare C; Bayford RH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 12166864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Study of the optimum level of electrode placement for the evaluation of absolute lung resistivity with the Mk3.5 EIT system.
Nebuya S; Noshiro M; Yonemoto A; Tateno S; Brown BH; Smallwood RH; Milnes P
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S129-37. PubMed ID: 16636404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Kalman filter approach to track fast impedance changes in electrical impedance tomography.
Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Apr; 45(4):486-93. PubMed ID: 9556965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images.
Adler A; Arnold JH; Bayford R; Borsic A; Brown B; Dixon P; Faes TJ; Frerichs I; Gagnon H; Gärber Y; Grychtol B; Hahn G; Lionheart WR; Malik A; Patterson RP; Stocks J; Tizzard A; Weiler N; Wolf GK
Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S35-55. PubMed ID: 19491438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
