195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19272998)
1. Experimental comparison of lesion detectability for four fully-3D PET reconstruction schemes.
Kadrmas DJ; Casey ME; Black NF; Hamill JJ; Panin VY; Conti M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Apr; 28(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 19272998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of varying number of OSEM subsets on PET lesion detectability.
Morey AM; Kadrmas DJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):268-73. PubMed ID: 24221921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of time-of-flight on PET tumor detection.
Kadrmas DJ; Casey ME; Conti M; Jakoby BW; Lois C; Townsend DW
J Nucl Med; 2009 Aug; 50(8):1315-23. PubMed ID: 19617317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET.
El Fakhri G; Santos PA; Badawi RD; Holdsworth CH; Van Den Abbeele AD; Kijewski MF
J Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 48(12):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18006613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 4D numerical observer for lesion detection in respiratory-gated PET.
Lorsakul A; Li Q; Trott CM; Hoog C; Petibon Y; Ouyang J; Laine AF; El Fakhri G
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):102504. PubMed ID: 25281979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A lesion detection observer study comparing 2-dimensional versus fully 3-dimensional whole-body PET imaging protocols.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Comtat C
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):714-23. PubMed ID: 15073270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of time-of-flight PET on whole-body oncologic studies: a human observer lesion detection and localization study.
Surti S; Scheuermann J; El Fakhri G; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Lim R; Abi-Hatem N; Moussallem E; Benard F; Mankoff D; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2011 May; 52(5):712-9. PubMed ID: 21498523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of scatter compensation strategies for (67)Ga SPECT using numerical observers and human LROC studies.
Farncombe TH; Gifford HC; Narayanan MV; Pretorius PH; Frey EC; King MA
J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):802-12. PubMed ID: 15136630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of attenuation correction on lesion detection using a hybrid PET system.
Tocharoenchai C; Tsui BM; Frey EC; Wang WT
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Jan; 88(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 15960226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain.
Leng S; Yu L; Zhang Y; Carter R; Toledano AY; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081908. PubMed ID: 23927322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ROC and localization ROC analyses of lesion detection in whole-body FDG PET: effects of acquisition mode, attenuation correction and reconstruction algorithm.
Farquhar TH; Llacer J; Hoh CK; Czernin J; Gambhir SS; Seltzer MA; Silverman DH; Qi J; Hsu C; Hoffman EJ
J Nucl Med; 1999 Dec; 40(12):2043-52. PubMed ID: 10616885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET.
Kadrmas DJ; Oktay MB; Casey ME; Hamill JJ
IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2012 Oct; 59(5):1940-1947. PubMed ID: 23293380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 3-D reconstruction with 3D-OSEM and with FORE+OSEM for PET.
Liu X; Comtat C; Michel C; Kinahan P; Defrise M; Townsend D
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):804-14. PubMed ID: 11513031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact on reader performance for lesion-detection/ localization tasks of anatomical priors in SPECT reconstruction.
Lehovich A; Bruyant PP; Gifford HS; Schneider PB; Squires S; Licho R; Gindi G; King MA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1459-67. PubMed ID: 19336295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation.
Tong S; Alessio AM; Kinahan PE
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):1453-73. PubMed ID: 20150683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Brain PET imaging optimization with time of flight and point spread function modelling.
Prieto E; Martí-Climent JM; Morán V; Sancho L; Barbés B; Arbizu J; Richter JA
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 26249138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ROC and LROC analyses of the effects of lesion contrast, size, and signal-to-noise ratio on detectability in PET images.
Farquhar TH; Llacer J; Sayre J; Tai YC; Hoffman EJ
J Nucl Med; 2000 Apr; 41(4):745-54. PubMed ID: 10768578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative role of motion and PSF compensation in whole-body oncologic PET-MR imaging.
Petibon Y; Huang C; Ouyang J; Reese TG; Li Q; Syrkina A; Chen YL; El Fakhri G
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042503. PubMed ID: 24694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Localization of liver lesions in abdominal CT imaging: II. Mathematical model observer performance correlates with human observer performance for localization of liver lesions in abdominal CT imaging.
Dilger SKN; Leng S; Chen B; Carter RE; Favazza CP; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH; Yu L
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105012. PubMed ID: 30995626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
