These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1927317)

  • 21. Comparison of cyclopentolate versus tropicamide cycloplegia in children.
    Egashira SM; Kish LL; Twelker JD; Mutti DO; Zadnik K; Adams AJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Dec; 70(12):1019-26. PubMed ID: 8115124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cycloplegic refraction in esotropic children. Cyclopentolate versus atropine.
    Rosenbaum AL; Bateman JB; Bremer DL; Liu PY
    Ophthalmology; 1981 Oct; 88(10):1031-4. PubMed ID: 7335305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Refraction in children: a comparison of two methods of accommodation control.
    Hopkins S; Sampson GP; Hendicott P; Lacherez P; Wood JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1734-9. PubMed ID: 23142881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.
    Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Incidence of side effects of topical atropine sulfate and cyclopentolate hydrochloride for cycloplegia in Japanese children: a multicenter study.
    Wakayama A; Nishina S; Miki A; Utsumi T; Sugasawa J; Hayashi T; Sato M; Kimura A; Fujikado T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 62(5):531-536. PubMed ID: 30046935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
    McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of cycloplegia in objective refraction.
    Jorge J; Queiros A; González-Méijome J; Fernandes P; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 15953119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children.
    Lei Y; Chen X; Cheng M; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Wang X
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1465-1472. PubMed ID: 36527496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
    Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the results of four different refraction measurement devices in children with retinoscopy.
    Simsek M; Oral Y; Erogul O; Sabaner MC; Simsek C; Yorukoglu S
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2022; 66(4):337-343. PubMed ID: 36589324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Retinoscopy under cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic conditions in children comparison of measurements of three examiners (author's transl)].
    Bujara K; Schulz E; Haase W
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1981; 216(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 6911000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of the Retinomax K-plus3 in measuring refractive error in a pediatric population.
    Peng MY; Matta N; Silbert D; Tian J; Singman E
    J AAPOS; 2014 Aug; 18(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 25173893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-effectiveness of cycloplegic agents: results of a randomized controlled trial in nigerian children.
    Ebri A; Kuper H; Wedner S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1025-31. PubMed ID: 17325142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Cycloplegia induced by cyclopentolate in the examination of refraction].
    Thomas MC; Caissial C
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1974; 74(5-6):621-31. PubMed ID: 4468166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of cycloplegic autorefraction and retinoscopy in Indian children.
    Guha S; Shah S; Shah K; Hurakadli P; Majee D; Gandhi S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2017 Jan; 100(1):73-78. PubMed ID: 27426488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Cycloplegia with cyclopentolate for testing-refraction of children (author's transl)].
    Stangler-Zuschrott E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1979 Jul; 175(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 582836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficiency of a video-autorefractometer used as a screening device for amblyogenic factors.
    Schimitzek T; Haase W
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):710-6. PubMed ID: 12271366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of cycloplegic refraction between Grand Seiko autorefractor and Retinomax autorefractor in the Vision in Preschoolers-Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Study.
    Ying GS; Maguire MG; Kulp MT; Ciner E; Moore B; Pistilli M; Candy R;
    J AAPOS; 2017 Jun; 21(3):219-223.e3. PubMed ID: 28528993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cycloplegic refraction after echothiophate iodide.
    Raab EL
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1983; 20(4):141-4. PubMed ID: 6886952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prospective comparison between cyclopentolate spray and drops in pediatric outpatients.
    Syrimi M; Jones SM; Thompson GM
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2013; 50(5):290-5. PubMed ID: 23705592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.