These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19274392)

  • 21. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM and Stereomicroscope.
    Heintze SD; Monreal D; Peschke A
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Apr; 17(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25893223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optical Evaluation of Enamel Microleakage with One-Step Self-Etch Adhesives.
    Turkistani A; Almutairi M; Banakhar N; Rubehan R; Mugharbil S; Jamleh A; Nasir A; Bakhsh T
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):589-594. PubMed ID: 29813001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of dentin deproteinization on microleakage of Class V composite restorations.
    Toledano M; Perdigão J; Osorio R; Osorio E
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 11203862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of fiber placement or flowable resin lining on microleakage in Class II adhesive restorations.
    Belli S; Orucoglu H; Yildirim C; Eskitascioglu G
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Apr; 9(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 17489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
    Rodrigues Junior SA; Pin LF; Machado G; Della Bona A; Demarco FF
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: effect of microhybrid, flowable, and compactable resins.
    Peris AR; Duarte S; de Andrade MF
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Feb; 34(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 12666857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of flexural load cycling on microleakage of extended root caries restorations.
    Minakuchi S; Munoz CA; Jessop N
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 15853110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin.
    Silveira de Araújo C; Incerti da Silva T; Ogliari FA; Meireles SS; Piva E; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 17091137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of new all-in-one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins.
    Pontes DG; de Melo AT; Monnerat AF
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Feb; 33(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 11890027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW; Harris EF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16536195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage of repaired class V silorane and nano-hybrid composite restorations after preparation with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and diamond bur.
    Yaman BC; Efes BG; Dörter C; Gömeç Y; Erdilek D; Yazıcıoğlu O
    Lasers Med Sci; 2011 Mar; 26(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 20162317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gingival microleakage of class V composite restorations with fiber inserts.
    Ahmed W; El-Badrawy W; Kulkarni G; Prakki A; El-Mowafy O
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):622-8. PubMed ID: 24309339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Leakage testing for different adhesive systems and composites to permanent teeth.
    Bolgul BS; Ayna B; Simsek I; Celenk S; Seker O; Kilinc G
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Jul; 20(7):787-791. PubMed ID: 28791970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth.
    Reeves GW; Fitchie JG; Hembree JH; Puckett AD
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):230-5. PubMed ID: 8710704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.