These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19275283)

  • 1. Contribution of very low amplitude-modulation rates to intelligibility in a competing-speech task (L).
    Füllgrabe C; Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1277-80. PubMed ID: 19275283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1063-76. PubMed ID: 18247908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the role of spectral and envelope characteristics in the intelligibility advantage of clear speech.
    Krause JC; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3346-57. PubMed ID: 19425675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of noise suppression and envelope dynamic range compression on the intelligibility of vocoded sentences for a tonal language.
    Chen F; Zheng D; Tsao Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1157. PubMed ID: 28964090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative contribution to speech intelligibility of different envelope modulation rates within the speech dynamic range.
    Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2127-37. PubMed ID: 20968383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefit of high-rate envelope cues in vocoder processing: effect of number of channels and spectral region.
    Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2272-82. PubMed ID: 19062865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of compression speed on intelligibility: simulated hearing-aid processing with and without original temporal fine structure information.
    Hopkins K; King A; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1592-601. PubMed ID: 22978888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Adaptation Rate and Noise Suppression on the Intelligibility of Compressed-Envelope Based Speech.
    Lai YH; Tsao Y; Chen F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133519. PubMed ID: 26196508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-rate envelope information in many channels provides resistance to reduction of speech intelligibility produced by multi-channel fast-acting compression.
    Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2155-8. PubMed ID: 19894794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Energetic and Informational Components of Speech-on-Speech Masking in Binaural Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort.
    Rennies J; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519854597. PubMed ID: 31172880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.
    Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 17(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 27090115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Hearing Loss and Fast-Acting Compression on Amplitude Modulation Perception and Speech Intelligibility.
    Wiinberg A; Jepsen ML; Epp B; Dau T
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 29668566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.
    Yi H; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4269-4281. PubMed ID: 31738862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intelligibility of interrupted sentences at subsegmental levels in young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Lee JH; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1153-63. PubMed ID: 19206889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of the speed of a single-channel dynamic range compressor on intelligibility in a competing speech task.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):1023-34. PubMed ID: 12942981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.