These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1927576)

  • 1. Effects of preliminary information in a Go versus No-go task.
    Miller J; Schäffer R; Hackley SA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1991 Jun; 76(3):241-92. PubMed ID: 1927576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence of preliminary response preparation from a divided attention task.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 Aug; 13(3):425-34. PubMed ID: 2958591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can response preparation begin before stimulus recognition finishes?
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Apr; 9(2):161-82. PubMed ID: 6221064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of action on visual search: behavioral response toward stimuli modifies the selection process.
    Buttaccio DR; Hahn S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1453-66. PubMed ID: 21491163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-based working memory guidance of visual attention.
    Chen Z; Tsou BH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1082-95. PubMed ID: 21264740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes.
    Miller J; Hackley SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Jun; 121(2):195-209. PubMed ID: 1318354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A psychophysiological study of the use of partial information in stimulus-response translation.
    Smid HG; Mulder G; Mulder LJ; Brands GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1101-19. PubMed ID: 1431747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The asynchronous discrete coding model: further tests with single-attribute stimuli.
    Trevena JA; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Nov; 60(8):1344-56. PubMed ID: 9865076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus-response compatibility effects in go-no-go tasks: a dimensional overlap account.
    Shiu LP; Kornblum S
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1613-23. PubMed ID: 10598474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The usefulness of partial information: effects of go probability in the choice/Nogo task.
    Low KA; Miller J
    Psychophysiology; 1999 May; 36(3):288-97. PubMed ID: 10352552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binding of event files in a (go/no-go) simon task with an accessory peripheral signal.
    Maetens K; Henderickx D; Soetens E
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 19261585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How much processing do nonattended stimuli receive? Apparently very little, but...
    Eriksen CW; Webb JM; Fournier LR
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 May; 47(5):477-88. PubMed ID: 2349060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the temporal relations between memory scanning and response preparation.
    Ilan AB; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1501-20. PubMed ID: 9778834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inhibition of return for the length of a line?
    Francis L; Milliken B
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1208-21. PubMed ID: 14710956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Location dominance in attending to color and shape.
    Tsal Y; Lavie N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Feb; 19(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 8440981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.