These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19276273)

  • 1. Alternate endpoints for screening phase II studies.
    Dhani N; Tu D; Sargent DJ; Seymour L; Moore MJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Mar; 15(6):1873-82. PubMed ID: 19276273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16843736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tumor shrinkage and objective response rates: gold standard for oncology efficacy screening trials, or an outdated end point?
    Bradbury P; Seymour L
    Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):354-60. PubMed ID: 19826353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimizing randomized phase II trials assessing tumor progression.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Carroll K; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 16807129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trial design for evaluation of novel targeted therapies.
    Farley J; Rose PG
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Feb; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19853899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Progression-free survival rate as primary end point for phase II cancer clinical trials: application to mesothelioma--The EORTC Lung Cancer Group.
    Francart J; Legrand C; Sylvester R; Van Glabbeke M; van Meerbeeck JP; Robert A
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jul; 24(19):3007-12. PubMed ID: 16809726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Correlation between response and survival].
    Ohtsu A; Boku N; Miyata Y; Ohkuwa M
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2000 May; 27(5):689-95. PubMed ID: 10832436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novel designs and end points for phase II clinical trials.
    Adjei AA; Christian M; Ivy P
    Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Mar; 15(6):1866-72. PubMed ID: 19276272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Other endpoints in screening studies for soft tissue sarcomas.
    Verweij J
    Oncologist; 2008; 13 Suppl 2():27-31. PubMed ID: 18434636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the Prentice criterion validate surrogate endpoints?
    Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1571-8. PubMed ID: 15122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Designing phase II studies in cancer with time-to-event endpoints.
    Owzar K; Jung SH
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):209-21. PubMed ID: 18559409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phase II clinical trials in oncology: are we hitting the target?
    Ang MK; Tan SB; Lim WT
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2010 Mar; 10(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 20214523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Methodological approaches of clinical studies with targeted therapies].
    Penel N; Saleron J; Lansiaux A; Clisant S; Adenis A; Fournier C; Duhamel A; Bonneterre J
    Bull Cancer; 2008 Feb; 95(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 18304903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Surrogate endpoints].
    Hill C
    Bull Cancer; 1999; 86(7-8):622-4. PubMed ID: 10477379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.
    El-Maraghi RH; Eisenhauer EA
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18285606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phase II stopping rules that employ response rates and early progression.
    Goffin JR; Tu D
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 26(22):3715-20. PubMed ID: 18669457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical endpoints for drug development in prostate cancer.
    Ramiah V; George DJ; Armstrong AJ
    Curr Opin Urol; 2008 May; 18(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 18382240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endpoints for assessing drug activity in clinical trials.
    Pazdur R
    Oncologist; 2008; 13 Suppl 2():19-21. PubMed ID: 18434634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs for Phase II oncology trials.
    Sun LZ; Chen C; Patel K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 19384690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.