These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19276821)

  • 1. Craniofacial distractor applicator.
    Dorfman DW; Ciminello FS; Wong GB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):475-7. PubMed ID: 19276821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided procedures in implantology, distraction and cranio-maxillofacial surgery.
    Schmelzeisen R; Schön R; Schramm A; Gellrich NC
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2002 Oct; 16():46-9. PubMed ID: 14507131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of skeletal movements in mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Yeshwant K; Seldin EB; Gateno J; Everett P; White CL; Kikinis R; Kaban LB; Troulis MJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 15742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an internal distraction device for syndromic craniosynostosis: device selection, problems, indications, and a proposal for use of a parallel bar for device-setting.
    Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Tosa Y; Kadomatsu K
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Nov; 17(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 17119404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distractor design and options.
    Van Sickels JE; Reddy LV
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2008 Sep; 16(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 18710690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distractor breakage in cranial distraction osteogenesis for children with craniosynostosis.
    Lee JA; Park DH; Yoon SH; Chung J
    Pediatr Neurosurg; 2008; 44(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 18354261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Distraction osteogenesis. A new development in craniofacial surgery].
    van Strijen PJ; Perdijk FB; Breuning KH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1998 Apr; 105(4):129-31. PubMed ID: 11928412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infant mandibular distraction with an internal curvilinear device.
    Miller JJ; Kahn D; Lorenz HP; Schendel SA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 18(6):1403-7. PubMed ID: 17993889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review of devices for distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial complex.
    Maull DJ
    Semin Orthod; 1999 Mar; 5(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 10371943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Introduction of a novel internal spring-driven craniofacial bone distraction device.
    Li M; Park SG; Kang DI; Eppley BL; Sadove AM; Coleman JJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 15(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 15167256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maxillary advancement by distraction osteogenesis.
    Reddy LV; Elhadi HM
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2008 Sep; 16(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 18710694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modified animal model and computer-assisted approach for dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis to reconstruct unilateral maxillectomy defect.
    Feng Z; Zhao J; Zhou L; Dong Y; Zhao Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2266-74. PubMed ID: 19761922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rabbits as a model for research into craniofacial distraction osteogenesis.
    Djasim UM; Hekking-Weijma JM; Wolvius EB; van Neck JW; van der Wal KG
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 46(8):620-4. PubMed ID: 18499312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel Rigid External Distraction Device Improves Stability and Controls the Vector During Midfacial Advancement.
    Resnick CM; Rottgers SA; Langenfeld CC; Mulliken JB; Padwa BL
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):1056-9. PubMed ID: 27213737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical influences of pin placement and elbow angle on hinge alignment and joint distraction of bridged elbow-pin-fixator construct.
    Shih KS; Lin SC; Chao CK; Lee WS; Lu TW; Hou SM
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(4):757-63. PubMed ID: 20106480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distraction osteogenesis in the surgical treatment of craniostenosis: a comparison of internal and external craniofacial distractor devices.
    Pelo S; Gasparini G; Di Petrillo A; Tamburrini G; Di Rocco C
    Childs Nerv Syst; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1447-53. PubMed ID: 17876585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-directional Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an individual prefabricated device.
    Klammert U; Böhm H; Schweitzer T; Würzler K; Gbureck U; Reuther J; Kübler A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 37(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 19157890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internal craniofacial distraction with biodegradable devices: early stabilization and protected bone regeneration.
    Cohen SR; Holmes RE; Amis P; Fichtner H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jul; 11(4):354-66. PubMed ID: 11314384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multivectorial, external halo-assisted midface distraction in patients with severe hypoplasia.
    Malagon HH; Romo GW; Quintero Mosqueda FR; Magaña FG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1663-9. PubMed ID: 19098577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stability, adaptation and growth following distraction osteogenesis in the craniofacial region.
    Peltomäki T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Aug; 12(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 19627520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.