404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19276976)
1. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better?
Kolibianakis EM; Venetis CA; Tarlatzis BC
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 21(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 19276976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation.
Balaban B; Urman B; Ata B; Isiklar A; Larman MG; Hamilton R; Gardner DK
Hum Reprod; 2008 Sep; 23(9):1976-82. PubMed ID: 18544577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of vitrification and slow-freezing of human day 3 cleavage stage embryos: post-vitrification development and pregnancy outcomes].
Li Y; Chen ZJ; Yang HJ; Zhong WX; Ma SY; Li M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 42(11):753-5. PubMed ID: 18307902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Loutradi KE; Kolibianakis EM; Venetis CA; Papanikolaou EG; Pados G; Bontis I; Tarlatzis BC
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):186-93. PubMed ID: 17980870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance.
Rienzi L; Gracia C; Maggiulli R; LaBarbera AR; Kaser DJ; Ubaldi FM; Vanderpoel S; Racowsky C
Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Mar; 23(2):139-155. PubMed ID: 27827818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of genotype on the efficiency of mouse embryo cryopreservation by vitrification or slow freezing methods.
Dinnyés A; Wallace GA; Rall WF
Mol Reprod Dev; 1995 Apr; 40(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 7598908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vitrification of human embryos previously cryostored by either slow freezing or vitrification results in high pregnancy rates.
Stanger J; Wong J; Conceicao J; Yovich J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Mar; 24(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 22289155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mouse blastocyst vitrification compared with the conventional slow-freezing method.
Tharnprisarn W; Suwajanakorn S; Sereepapong W; Pruksananonda K; Boonyakasemsanti W; Virutamasen P; Ahnonkitpanit V; Chompurat D; Numchaisrika P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Jul; 86(7):666-71. PubMed ID: 12948262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.
El-Toukhy T; Kamal A; Wharf E; Grace J; Bolton V; Khalaf Y; Braude P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19567414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional slow freezing, vitrification and open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification of rabbit embryos.
Naik BR; Rao BS; Vagdevi R; Gnanprakash M; Amarnath D; Rao VH
Anim Reprod Sci; 2005 Apr; 86(3-4):329-38. PubMed ID: 15766810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blastocyst rate and live births from vitrification and slow-cooled two-cell mouse embryos.
Graves-Herring JE; Boone WR
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):920-4. PubMed ID: 18314119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open pulled straw vitrification of goat embryos at various stages of development.
Al Yacoub AN; Gauly M; Holtz W
Theriogenology; 2010 May; 73(8):1018-23. PubMed ID: 20102780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cryopreservation of day 2-3 embryos by vitrification yields better outcome than slow freezing.
Levron J; Leibovitz O; Brengauz M; Gitman H; Yerushalmi GM; Katorza E; Gat I; Elizur SE
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2014 Mar; 30(3):202-4. PubMed ID: 24397397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The worldwide frozen embryo reservoir: methodologies to achieve optimal results.
Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Buccheri M; Maggiulli R; Sapienza F; Romano S; Colamaria S; Iussig B; Giuliani M; Palagiano A; Ubaldi F
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2011 Mar; 1221():32-9. PubMed ID: 21401627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of different cryoprotectants and cryopreservation protocols on the development of 2-4 cell mouse embryos.
Liu WX; Lu H; Luo MJ; Xu LZ
Cryo Letters; 2011; 32(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 21766153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved vitrification method allowing direct transfer of goat embryos.
Guignot F; Bouttier A; Baril G; Salvetti P; Pignon P; Beckers JF; Touzé JL; Cognié J; Traldi AS; Cognié Y; Mermillod P
Theriogenology; 2006 Sep; 66(4):1004-11. PubMed ID: 16581117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Outcome of embryo vitrification compared to slow freezing process at early cleavage stages. Report of the first French birth].
Sifer C; Sermondade N; Dupont C; Poncelet C; Cédrin-Durnerin I; Hugues JN; Benzacken B; Levy R
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Mar; 40(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22154672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application.
Liebermann J; Tucker MJ
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 16762345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
