These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19277977)

  • 21. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
    Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
    Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
    Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements.
    Sarris I; Ioannou C; Chamberlain P; Ohuma E; Roseman F; Hoch L; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 22535628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prospective assessment of reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound for fetal biometry.
    Ambroise Grandjean G; Berveiller P; Hossu G; Noble P; Chamagne M; Morel O
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020; 101(7-8):481-487. PubMed ID: 32241702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study.
    Ambroise Grandjean G; Hossu G; Banasiak C; Ciofolo-Veit C; Raynaud C; Rouet L; Morel O; Beaumont M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e031777. PubMed ID: 31843832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Common fetal measurements: a comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Parkar AP; Olsen ØE; Gjelland K; Kiserud T; Rosendahl K
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20088642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of automated tool for two-dimensional fetal biometry.
    Salim I; Cavallaro A; Ciofolo-Veit C; Rouet L; Raynaud C; Mory B; Collet Billon A; Harrison G; Roundhill D; Papageorghiou AT
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):650-654. PubMed ID: 30478919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The feasibility of using 5D CNS software in obtaining standard fetal head measurements from volumes acquired by three-dimensional ultrasonography: comparison with two-dimensional ultrasound.
    Rizzo G; Aiello E; Pietrolucci ME; Arduini D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(14):2217-22. PubMed ID: 26364724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis in the assessment of trainee competence in fetal biometry measurement.
    Weerasinghe S; Mirghani H; Revel A; Abu-Zidan FM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 16858722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Discrepancy of ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) and femur length in relation to sex of the fetus and duration of pregnancy].
    L'ubuský M; Mícková I; Procházka M; Dzvincuk P; Malá K; Cízek L; Janout V
    Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 16768041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
    Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-dimensional volume sonographic study of fetal anatomy: intraobserver reproducibility and effect of examiner experience.
    Mercé LT; Barco MJ; Bau S
    J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jul; 27(7):1053-63. PubMed ID: 18577669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
    von Kaisenberg CS; Fritzer E; Kühling H; Jonat W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):564-74. PubMed ID: 12493045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of maternal body mass index on interobserver variability of fetal ultrasound biometry and amniotic-fluid assessment in late pregnancy.
    Martins JG; Kawakita T; Gurganus M; Baraki D; Jain P; Papageorghiou AT; Abuhamad AZ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 58(6):892-899. PubMed ID: 33836119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Would gestational age and presence of brain anomalies affect interobserver reliability of fetal head biometry? Using off-line analysis of 3-D dataset.
    Salman MS; Mousa HA; Twining P; Jones NW; James D; Momtaz M; Aboulghar M; El-Sheikhah A; Bugg G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 38(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 22104532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fetal age assessment based on femur length at 10-25 weeks of gestation, and reference ranges for femur length to head circumference ratios.
    Johnsen SL; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):725-33. PubMed ID: 16026396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Chinese fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with charts from other populations.
    Zhang Y; Meng H; Jiang Y; Xu Z; Ouyang Y; Li S; Chen Q; Wu Q; Li R; Ru T; Cai A; Chen X; Yang T; Chen P; Xie H; Lu H; Dai Q; Dong F; Yang M; Yang X; Lu J; Tian J; Sun K; Li H;
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(9):1507-1515. PubMed ID: 29216774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ultrasonographic monitoring of fetal development in unrestrained bonobos (Pan paniscus) at the Milwaukee County Zoo.
    Drews B; Harmann LM; Beehler LL; Bell B; Drews RF; Hildebrandt TB
    Zoo Biol; 2011; 30(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 20073051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry.
    Peixoto-Filho FM; de Sá RA; Velarde LG; de Castro Mocarzel C; Lopes LM; Ville Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 22899306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.