399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19277977)
21. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements.
Sarris I; Ioannou C; Chamberlain P; Ohuma E; Roseman F; Hoch L; Altman DG; Papageorghiou AT;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 22535628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prospective assessment of reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound for fetal biometry.
Ambroise Grandjean G; Berveiller P; Hossu G; Noble P; Chamagne M; Morel O
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020; 101(7-8):481-487. PubMed ID: 32241702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study.
Ambroise Grandjean G; Hossu G; Banasiak C; Ciofolo-Veit C; Raynaud C; Rouet L; Morel O; Beaumont M
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e031777. PubMed ID: 31843832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Common fetal measurements: a comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
Parkar AP; Olsen ØE; Gjelland K; Kiserud T; Rosendahl K
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20088642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of automated tool for two-dimensional fetal biometry.
Salim I; Cavallaro A; Ciofolo-Veit C; Rouet L; Raynaud C; Mory B; Collet Billon A; Harrison G; Roundhill D; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):650-654. PubMed ID: 30478919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The feasibility of using 5D CNS software in obtaining standard fetal head measurements from volumes acquired by three-dimensional ultrasonography: comparison with two-dimensional ultrasound.
Rizzo G; Aiello E; Pietrolucci ME; Arduini D
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(14):2217-22. PubMed ID: 26364724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis in the assessment of trainee competence in fetal biometry measurement.
Weerasinghe S; Mirghani H; Revel A; Abu-Zidan FM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 16858722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Discrepancy of ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) and femur length in relation to sex of the fetus and duration of pregnancy].
L'ubuský M; Mícková I; Procházka M; Dzvincuk P; Malá K; Cízek L; Janout V
Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 16768041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-dimensional volume sonographic study of fetal anatomy: intraobserver reproducibility and effect of examiner experience.
Mercé LT; Barco MJ; Bau S
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jul; 27(7):1053-63. PubMed ID: 18577669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
von Kaisenberg CS; Fritzer E; Kühling H; Jonat W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):564-74. PubMed ID: 12493045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of maternal body mass index on interobserver variability of fetal ultrasound biometry and amniotic-fluid assessment in late pregnancy.
Martins JG; Kawakita T; Gurganus M; Baraki D; Jain P; Papageorghiou AT; Abuhamad AZ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 58(6):892-899. PubMed ID: 33836119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Would gestational age and presence of brain anomalies affect interobserver reliability of fetal head biometry? Using off-line analysis of 3-D dataset.
Salman MS; Mousa HA; Twining P; Jones NW; James D; Momtaz M; Aboulghar M; El-Sheikhah A; Bugg G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 38(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 22104532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fetal age assessment based on femur length at 10-25 weeks of gestation, and reference ranges for femur length to head circumference ratios.
Johnsen SL; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):725-33. PubMed ID: 16026396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Chinese fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with charts from other populations.
Zhang Y; Meng H; Jiang Y; Xu Z; Ouyang Y; Li S; Chen Q; Wu Q; Li R; Ru T; Cai A; Chen X; Yang T; Chen P; Xie H; Lu H; Dai Q; Dong F; Yang M; Yang X; Lu J; Tian J; Sun K; Li H;
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(9):1507-1515. PubMed ID: 29216774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ultrasonographic monitoring of fetal development in unrestrained bonobos (Pan paniscus) at the Milwaukee County Zoo.
Drews B; Harmann LM; Beehler LL; Bell B; Drews RF; Hildebrandt TB
Zoo Biol; 2011; 30(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 20073051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry.
Peixoto-Filho FM; de Sá RA; Velarde LG; de Castro Mocarzel C; Lopes LM; Ville Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 22899306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
