These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19278327)

  • 1. Biomechanical rigidity of cadaveric cervical spine with posterior versus combined posterior and anterior instrumentation.
    Dahdaleh NS; Nakamura S; Torner JC; Lim TH; Hitchon PW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Feb; 10(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 19278327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation after one-level anterior cervical corpectomy in the human cadaveric spine.
    Karam YR; Dahdaleh NS; Magnetta MJ; Kim BS; Lim TH; Serhan H; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(7):E455-60. PubMed ID: 20847712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus translaminar C-2 screw fixation in C2-3 instrumentation.
    Reddy C; Ingalhalikar AV; Channon S; Lim TH; Torner J; Hitchon PW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Oct; 7(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 17933316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative biomechanical analysis of spinal instability and instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Prybis BG; Tortolani PJ; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC; Cunningham BW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 May; 20(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 17473645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study.
    Clavenna AL; Beutler WJ; Gudipally M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
    Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 22405617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison between C-7 lateral mass and pedicle screws in subaxial cervical constructs. Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Meeting. Laboratory investigation.
    Xu R; McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):688-94. PubMed ID: 21121745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
    Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy.
    Doğan S; Baek S; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation techniques after one-level laminectomy and facetectomy.
    Eleraky M; Setzer M; Baaj AA; Papanastassiou I; Conrad BP; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Nov; 13(5):622-9. PubMed ID: 21039154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical evaluation of posterior screw fixation in cadaveric cervical spines.
    Papagelopoulos PJ; Currier BL; Neale PG; Hokari Y; Berglund LJ; Larson DR; Fisher DR; An KN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jun; (411):13-24. PubMed ID: 12782855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The biomechanical effect of transverse connectors use in a pre- and postlaminectomy model of the posterior cervical spine: an in vitro cadaveric study.
    Majid K; Gudipally M; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):E1694-701. PubMed ID: 21681141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posterior-only stabilization of 2-column and 3-column injuries at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
    O'Brien JR; Dmitriev AE; Yu W; Gelb D; Ludwig S
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 19525789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal reconstruction technique after C-2 corpectomy and spondylectomy: a biomechanical analysis.
    Scheer JK; Tang J; Eguizabal J; Farin A; Buckley JM; Deviren V; McClellan RT; Ames CP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 May; 12(5):517-24. PubMed ID: 20441484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs.
    McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
    Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cortical bone facet spacers for cervical spine decompression: effects on intervertebral kinetics and foraminal area.
    Maulucci CM; Sansur CA; Singh V; Cholewczynski A; Shetye SS; McGilvray K; Puttlitz CM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 26407085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.