These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19278916)
1. A no-reference objective image sharpness metric based on the notion of just noticeable blur (JNB). Ferzli R; Karam LJ IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Apr; 18(4):717-28. PubMed ID: 19278916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A no-reference image blur metric based on the cumulative probability of blur detection (CPBD). Narvekar ND; Karam LJ IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Sep; 20(9):2678-83. PubMed ID: 21447451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Perceptual sharpness metric for visible and infrared color fusion images]. Gao SS; Jin WQ; Wang X; Wang LX; Luo Y Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2012 Dec; 32(12):3197-202. PubMed ID: 23427534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep feature loss to denoise OCT images using deep neural networks. Mehdizadeh M; MacNish C; Xiao D; Alonso-Caneiro D; Kugelman J; Bennamoun M J Biomed Opt; 2021 Apr; 26(4):. PubMed ID: 33893726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No-reference image sharpness assessment in autoregressive parameter space. Gu K; Zhai G; Lin W; Yang X; Zhang W IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Oct; 24(10):3218-31. PubMed ID: 26054063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality image metrics for synthetic images based on perceptual color differences. Albin S; Rougeron G; Péroche B; Trémeau A IEEE Trans Image Process; 2002; 11(9):961-71. PubMed ID: 18249719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. No-reference blur assessment of digital pictures based on multifeature classifiers. Ciancio A; da Costa AL; da Silva EA; Said A; Samadani R; Obrador P IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Jan; 20(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 21172744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image sharpness assessment based on local phase coherence. Hassen R; Wang Z; Salama MM IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Jul; 22(7):2798-810. PubMed ID: 23481852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Underwater Color Image Quality Evaluation Metric. Yang M; Sowmya A IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Dec; 24(12):6062-71. PubMed ID: 26513783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A customized acutance metric for quality control applications in MRI. Venuji Renuka S; Edla DR; Joseph J Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 May; 60(5):1511-1525. PubMed ID: 35320457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. S3: a spectral and spatial measure of local perceived sharpness in natural images. Vu CT; Phan TD; Chandler DM IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Mar; 21(3):934-45. PubMed ID: 21965207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sharpness enhancement of stereo images using binocular just-noticeable difference. Jung SW; Jeong JY; Ko SJ IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Mar; 21(3):1191-9. PubMed ID: 21908253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. LBP-Based Segmentation of Defocus Blur. Xin Yi ; Eramian M IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Apr; 25(4):1626-38. PubMed ID: 26886995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No-Reference Quality Assessment Method for Blurriness of SEM Micrographs with Multiple Texture. Wang H; Hu X; Xu H; Li S; Lu Z Scanning; 2019; 2019():4271761. PubMed ID: 31281563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A fuzzy image metric with application to fractal coding. Li J; Chen G; Chi Z IEEE Trans Image Process; 2002; 11(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 18244662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality assessment based on multiscale geometric analysis. Gao X; Lu W; Tao D; Li X IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Jul; 18(7):1409-23. PubMed ID: 19447715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Constrained acquisition of ink spreading curves from printed color images. Bugnon T; Hersch RD IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Feb; 20(2):513-22. PubMed ID: 20699211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]